Re: [pfSense Support] nat & firewall logs

2005-10-23 Thread Bill Marquette
On 10/23/05, jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill, > > your options are quite valid, but anyway, exporting to netflow, a rule > number in the log line will help so much. The rule numbers are in the log line I thought? At any rate, since we add numerous rules depending on features a

Re: [pfSense Support] nat & firewall logs

2005-10-23 Thread jonathan gonzalez
Bill, your options are quite valid, but anyway, exporting to netflow, a rule number in the log line will help so much. Would be posible to achieve this in a "low cost of time" fashion? Do the developers find this interesing for 'your' product? TIA, jonathan Bill Marquette wrote: On 10

Re: [pfSense Support] nat & firewall logs

2005-10-23 Thread Bill Marquette
On 10/23/05, jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > this post is more likely to be a request than a support post. > > I think that the firewall logs should be complemented with nat logs and > a very imporant column (on both logs) in order to review a lot of logs: > rule number. > >

[pfSense Support] nat & firewall logs

2005-10-23 Thread jonathan gonzalez
Hi, this post is more likely to be a request than a support post. I think that the firewall logs should be complemented with nat logs and a very imporant column (on both logs) in order to review a lot of logs: rule number. I think this would be important in high production environmentes wher