Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-08-02 Thread Fabian Abplanalp
Am 01.08.2010 22:01, schrieb Chris Buechler: You're using polling, so that's to be expected. Thanks for hte hint! fabiana smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-08-01 Thread Chris Buechler
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Fabian Abplanalp wrote: >  Am 01.08.2010 02:02, schrieb Chris Buechler: >> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Fabian Abplanalp >>  wrote: >>> >>>  Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler: Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description,

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-08-01 Thread Fabian Abplanalp
Am 01.08.2010 02:02, schrieb Chris Buechler: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Fabian Abplanalp wrote: Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler: Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent amount of traffic

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-07-31 Thread Chris Buechler
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Fabian Abplanalp wrote: >  Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler: >> >> Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system >> is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent amount of >> traffic then yeah it's probably normal. > > Cu

RE: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-07-31 Thread Adam Thompson
: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on > > Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler: > > Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, > system > > is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent a

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-07-31 Thread Fabian Abplanalp
Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler: Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent amount of traffic then yeah it's probably normal. Current traffic is low (WAN in 56Kbps/out 700kbps)... Even with "no" traffi

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-07-31 Thread Chris Buechler
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Fabian Abplanalp wrote: >  Sawadeekap > > I'm running pfSense 2.0 BETA4 on a Supermicro ATOM Barebone (5010A-PHF). > Everything works more or less as expected, except I see always a CPU usage > of 25% (Dualcore with HT) in the GUI. > > Is that ok? > Maybe. Maybe n

[pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 Beta4 on

2010-07-31 Thread Fabian Abplanalp
Sawadeekap I'm running pfSense 2.0 BETA4 on a Supermicro ATOM Barebone (5010A-PHF). Everything works more or less as expected, except I see always a CPU usage of 25% (Dualcore with HT) in the GUI. Is that ok? Thanks, Fabian top on shell says: last pid: 51666; load averages: 1.08, 1.03,