Re: [pfSense Support] secondary or virtual IP's

2008-05-21 Thread Chris Buechler
Curtis Maurand wrote: Not really, but let me try. rl0 (LAN)10.0.1.2/24 actual--|---|switch| 10.201.8.115/28 virtual-|---|--| | |ipsec tunnel to this interface/lan segment wanted |-| de0

Re: [pfSense Support] secondary or virtual IP's

2008-05-21 Thread Curtis Maurand
t.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 207.252.7748 - Original Message - From: "Chris Buechler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 5:52:03 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] secondary or virtual IP's On Tue

Re: [pfSense Support] secondary or virtual IP's

2008-05-20 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Curtis Maurand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > Having slight problem with a 1.2 version of the firewall. > > We have a working configuration using an openroute GT900 (don't go there...I > know its old.). with an outside client who insists on assigning us a >

[pfSense Support] secondary or virtual IP's

2008-05-20 Thread Curtis Maurand
Hello, Having slight problem with a 1.2 version of the firewall. We have a working configuration using an openroute GT900 (don't go there...I know its old.). with an outside client who insists on assigning us a 10.nnn.nnn.nnn network for use with an IPSec tunnel. We're already have 10.0.1.0/2