t: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load balance
>
> Thank you for your answer. I'll wait for some modification of
> slbd's sensitivity.
>
> Nelu
> - Original Message -
> From: "Holger Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> S
Thank you for your answer. I'll wait for some modification of slbd's
sensitivity.
Nelu
- Original Message -
From: "Holger Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load
out or number of pings?
>
> Nelu
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Holger Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:41 AM
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load balance
>
>
> What you see
pings low priority.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Nelu Sofrone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:36 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load balance
>
> Thank you for replay.
>
lger Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load balance
What you see is caused by unreliable monitor Ips (they don't answer to
pings all the time). Try to use different monitor IP for your pools
What you see is caused by unreliable monitor Ips (they don't answer to
pings all the time). Try to use different monitor IP for your pools.
Loadbalancing is stable. I'm using it at several locations without
issues. However with the latest snapshots a new feature (failover pools)
was added and the p
