>
> Doesn't this create a ton of DNS traffic traversing the firewall?
>>
> Why does it create any more DNS traffic than doing it any other way?
>
>
I've actually got a decent sized block of public IP's to play with, so I
will get started on this later in the week. The reason I am concerned about
ad
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Tim Dressel wrote:
> Because OpenDNS does their filtering based on the source IP address, you
>> would have to have eat LAN have its own outgoing IP(s) using Outbound NAT
>> rules.
>>
>>
> I've never actually done outbound NAT. So lets say I've got multiple IP
> a
>
> Because OpenDNS does their filtering based on the source IP address, you
> would have to have eat LAN have its own outgoing IP(s) using Outbound NAT
> rules.
>
>
I've never actually done outbound NAT. So lets say I've got multiple IP
addresses bound as virtual IP's onto the physical WAN interfa
Because OpenDNS does their filtering based on the source IP address, you
would have to have eat LAN have its own outgoing IP(s) using Outbound NAT
rules.
You can turn off the pfSense DNS altogether and just set the server to
forward all requests it cannot resolve directly to OpenDNS.
Nathan Eisenberg schreef:
Any easy way of telling how many DHCP leases are used/remaining in the pool?
Depends on the situation, if on a carp setup with failover it is pretty
hard to do.
On a single install the diag dhcp leases page is your best indication.
If you set a range from 50-100, i
few here and there.
Thanks guys,
-Tim
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob
Terhaar
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006
6:31 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support]
DHCP Question
On 10/30/06, Tim
Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10/30/06, Tim Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a DCHP range setup up on one of my interfaces of
192.168.1.100
– 253
I have 1:1 mappings on 192.168.1.194
– 253.
I would like it to use those in the 1:1 range before going
below. We are a hotel… and so have a high
