On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 20:01, Abe Bachrach wrote:
> Sebastian, that sounds like something to try, but wouldn't that
> significantly reduce the field of view?
Yes the field of view will be much smaller, you would have to select a
wider angle lens to compensate.
> Also, do you know if the WOI se
Sebastian, that sounds like something to try, but wouldn't that
significantly reduce the field of view?
Also, do you know if the WOI settings avoid the "horizontal blanking" issue
which is what would cause the binning/skipping solution to not provide that
great of an improvement? I don't see anyth
I'll respond inline
Also coming back to our phone conversation - there are no perfect high
> resolution global shutter sensor that I know of. The high resolution global
> shutter CCDs suffer from limited shutter ratio so some light gets into the
> CCD registers during readout and the image sna
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:07, Abe Bachrach wrote:
> thanks for the quick response.
> In talking with one of the other people in lab, we realized that most of the
> experience that we had working with cameras with rolling shutters was with
> cheap webcams. We hoped that the readout on the elphel s
Abe,
Also coming back to our phone conversation - there are no perfect high
resolution global shutter sensor that I know of. The high resolution global
shutter CCDs suffer from limited shutter ratio so some light gets into the
CCD registers during readout and the image snapshot is combined with th
thanks for the quick response.
In talking with one of the other people in lab, we realized that most of the
experience that we had working with cameras with rolling shutters was with
cheap webcams. We hoped that the readout on the elphel sensor *might* be
fast enough that the rolling shutter effec
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Abe Bachrach wrote:
> One other question for Andrey/someone else is:
>
> - How much time elapses between when the first and last row are read-out?
>
> from looking at the datasheet, it says that the maximum datarate is 96Mp/s,
> which would mean that for full reso
One other question for Andrey/someone else is:
- How much time elapses between when the first and last row are read-out?
from looking at the datasheet, it says that the maximum datarate is 96Mp/s,
which would mean that for full resolution, the time gap would be at least
0.052488 seconds.
- is th
Thanks for the response
>From talking to Andrey and Olga on the phone, it sounds like no one at
elphel would have the time to tackle something like this themselves, so we'd
have to look to the broader community.
The type of sensor that we would be interested in is much lower resolution
than
Current Elphel 353 camera only has the rolling shutter option, there
is Elphel 363 as well that uses a high resolution, large scale Kodak
CCD but these sensors are rather expensive (~3000$) and only deliver a
rather low framerate (3-5fps if I remember correctly). Also if I
remember correctly Elphel
Hi there,
I was very excited to find the Elphel camera since it looked like exactly
what I was looking for in terms of a camera integrated with an FPGA, however
I was disappointed to see that the only sensor available uses a rolling
shutter.
I am interested in using the FPGA to do visual odometry
11 matches
Mail list logo
