Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-13 Thread Leonidas Jones
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Henry wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Henry wrote: I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey. I notice in my profile that I have two .slt folders. One has only a folder called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache. The other

Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Henry wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Henry wrote: I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey. I notice in my profile that I have two .slt folders. One has only a folder called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache. The other has many, many items including boo

Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Henry wrote: I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey. I notice in my profile that I have two .slt folders. One has only a folder called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache. The other has many, many items including bookmarks etc. Should I have two .slt folders and will t

Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-13 Thread Henry
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Henry wrote: I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey. I notice in my profile that I have two .slt folders. One has only a folder called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache. The other has many, many items including bookmarks etc.

two .slt folders

2009-04-13 Thread Henry
I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey. I notice in my profile that I have two .slt folders. One has only a folder called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache. The other has many, many items including bookmarks etc. Should I have two .slt folders and will that give me tr

Re: Gone back to v1 (1.1.16) but

2009-04-13 Thread Frosted Flake
Leonidas Jones wrote: captjlddavis wrote: On 4/12/2009 20:59, Leonidas Jones wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:52:36 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:34:06 -0700, Pete

Re: SeaMonkey and Facebook

2009-04-13 Thread Leonidas Jones
DoctorBill wrote: DoctorBill wrote: I had to join Facebook recently for some friends and relatives. A lot of the "buttons" and Links do not work when I enter Facebook using SeaMonkey 1.1 I have to use I.E. Is there anything I can do about this or is it FaceBook's programmers fault ? DoctorBi

Re: Gone back to v1 (1.1.16) but

2009-04-13 Thread Leonidas Jones
captjlddavis wrote: On 4/12/2009 20:59, Leonidas Jones wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:52:36 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:34:06 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hi

Re: SeaMonkey and Facebook

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
DoctorBill wrote: DoctorBill wrote: I had to join Facebook recently for some friends and relatives. A lot of the "buttons" and Links do not work when I enter Facebook using SeaMonkey 1.1 I have to use I.E. Is there anything I can do about this or is it FaceBook's programmers fault ? Doctor

Re: SeaMonkey and Facebook

2009-04-13 Thread DoctorBill
DoctorBill wrote: I had to join Facebook recently for some friends and relatives. A lot of the "buttons" and Links do not work when I enter Facebook using SeaMonkey 1.1 I have to use I.E. Is there anything I can do about this or is it FaceBook's programmers fault ? DoctorBill After having

Re: Gone back to v1 (1.1.16) but

2009-04-13 Thread captjlddavis
On 4/12/2009 20:59, Leonidas Jones wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Leonidas Jones wrote: >>> Bill Davidsen wrote: Jim S wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:52:36 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo > wrote: > >> Jim S wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:34:06 -0700, Peter Pota

Re: SM 1.1.14 problem with Fox website

2009-04-13 Thread chicagofan
Rich Gray wrote: Martin Feitag wrote: Just install it to another folder, SM2 will import the profile from your SM1.1.x profile and place the new profile somewhere else automtically :-) > Be careful if you have pop3 e-mail configured. You will wind up with two different programs pulling dow

Re: Question about threading in the email Notices from the new Adobe Forums

2009-04-13 Thread Phillip Jones
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I read and post in the Adobe Forums. Recently, Adobe decided to switch to Jive system from there old WebX system. In old system Subjects were threaded as (example): Acrobat 9.1 does not sort pages correct Re:Acrobat 9.1 does not

Re: Question about threading in the email Notices from the new Adobe Forums

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Phillip Jones wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I read and post in the Adobe Forums. Recently, Adobe decided to switch to Jive system from there old WebX system. In old system Subjects were threaded as (example): Acrobat 9.1 does not sort pages correct R

Re: Gone back to v1 (1.1.16) but

2009-04-13 Thread Jim S
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:43:59 -0400, Leonidas Jones wrote: > Jim S wrote: >> On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:32:19 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> >>> Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:52:36 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > Jim S wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:34:06 -0700,

Re: Gone back to v1 (1.1.16) but

2009-04-13 Thread Leonidas Jones
Jim S wrote: On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:32:19 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:52:36 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:34:06 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Jim S wrote: I have abandoned v2a3 until som

Re: Question about threading in the email Notices from the new Adobe Forums

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Phillip Jones wrote: I read and post in the Adobe Forums. Recently, Adobe decided to switch to Jive system from there old WebX system. In old system Subjects were threaded as (example): Acrobat 9.1 does not sort pages correct Re:Acrobat 9.1 does not sort pages correct Re:Acrobat 9.

Re: Can't view European WoW site properly?

2009-04-13 Thread Ant
On 4/13/2009 7:29 AM PT, David E. Ross typed: On 4/13/2009 5:56 AM, Ant wrote: Hello! Is it me or is http://www.wow-europe.com/en/index.xml messed up under SeaMonkey v1.1.15? Firefox v2.0 and IE6.0 SP2 looked fine. Thank you in advance. :) The site is sniffing for Firefox. On the other h

Re: Can't view European WoW site properly?

2009-04-13 Thread David E. Ross
On 4/13/2009 5:56 AM, Ant wrote: > Hello! > > Is it me or is http://www.wow-europe.com/en/index.xml messed up under > SeaMonkey v1.1.15? Firefox v2.0 and IE6.0 SP2 looked fine. > > Thank you in advance. :) The site is sniffing for Firefox. On the other hand, the menu down the left side of the

Question about threading in the email Notices from the new Adobe Forums

2009-04-13 Thread Phillip Jones
I read and post in the Adobe Forums. Recently, Adobe decided to switch to Jive system from there old WebX system. In old system Subjects were threaded as (example): Acrobat 9.1 does not sort pages correct Re:Acrobat 9.1 does not sort pages correct Re:Acrobat 9.1 does not sort pages co

Can't view European WoW site properly?

2009-04-13 Thread Ant
Hello! Is it me or is http://www.wow-europe.com/en/index.xml messed up under SeaMonkey v1.1.15? Firefox v2.0 and IE6.0 SP2 looked fine. Thank you in advance. :) -- "I used to own an ant farm but had to give it up. I couldn't find tractors small enough to fit it." --Steven Wright /\___/\

Re: Gone back to v1 (1.1.16) but

2009-04-13 Thread Jim S
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:32:19 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Jim S wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:52:36 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: >> >>> Jim S wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:34:06 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > Jim S wrote: >> I have abandoned v

Anti-HTML in e-mail thread from m.s.seamonkey (was: Re: Forwarding messages)

2009-04-13 Thread Daniel
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Nobody wrote: Slightly off topic, but I read "somewhere" recently that it's considered rude by a lot of e-mail users to receive messages in html. I have one small business I deal with occasionally that refuses to acknowledge any message not as only. i