Re: What most advanced Java compatible with Seamonkey?

On Jun 21, 3:42 pm, GreenXenon wrote: > Hi: > > I have the latest version of SeaMonkey -- SeaMonkey 1.1.16 Mozilla/5.0 > (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 > SeaMonkey/1.1.16 > > I just installed Java-6-Update-14 but it's not working. Java doesn't > show up on the test

Re: What most advanced Java compatible with Seamonkey?

On 06/21/09 15:37, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Cruz, Jaime wrote: >> GreenXenon wrote: >>> Hi: >>> >>> I have the latest version of SeaMonkey -- SeaMonkey 1.1.16 Mozilla/5.0 >>> (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 >>> SeaMonkey/1.1.16 >>> >>> I just installed Java-6-Updat

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

In , Nairda wrote: > http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1716&tag=nl.e011 > > Snip: > "We added this support at the machine level in order to enable the > feature for all users on the machine. Seems reasonable right? Well, > turns ou

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

Benoit Renard wrote: David E. Ross wrote: The malware is a Firefox extension that (among other things) disables the ability of Firefox to remove it. As far as I know, they didn't disable uninstallation. It just isn't possible while using Firefox because it's installed on the application leve

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

David E. Ross wrote: The malware is a Firefox extension that (among other things) disables the ability of Firefox to remove it. As far as I know, they didn't disable uninstallation. It just isn't possible while using Firefox because it's installed on the application level, and not in the user

Re: SM 2.0 and Firefox 3.5 RC1 is appearing

JR WG wrote: Exactly the reason that I left the original memo, that Firefox 3.5 RC1 was out in the wild. Hopefully, this means that SM 2, an obviously even better idea browser-and-then-some, is ever nearing its own introduction. This doesn't affect SeaMonkey 2.0 at all, as the problem is synci

Re: What most advanced Java compatible with Seamonkey?

Cruz, Jaime wrote: GreenXenon wrote: Hi: I have the latest version of SeaMonkey -- SeaMonkey 1.1.16 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 I just installed Java-6-Update-14 but it's not working. Java doesn't show up on the test website [i.e

Re: What most advanced Java compatible with Seamonkey?

GreenXenon wrote: Hi: I have the latest version of SeaMonkey -- SeaMonkey 1.1.16 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 I just installed Java-6-Update-14 but it's not working. Java doesn't show up on the test website [i.e. http://java.com/en

Re: Is this spam, or what??

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Graham wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I see no indication that anything has been stripped out en route (by antivirus software, for example). My local AV log shows nothing, too. So I don't get the point of it... Two things are possible. First, it didn't bounce: you

What most advanced Java compatible with Seamonkey?

Hi: I have the latest version of SeaMonkey -- SeaMonkey 1.1.16 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 I just installed Java-6-Update-14 but it's not working. Java doesn't show up on the test website [i.e. http://java.com/en/download/help/testv

Re: Preferences hangs

On 06/21/09 07:16, stan wrote: > Martin Feitag wrote: >> stan schrieb: >>> Using 1.1.16. I go into Preferences within Mail and News. Click Mail >>> and Newgroups. The options for making SeaMonkey the defaults for mail >>> and news are not checked. I check them and click on OK. It hangs and >>> ha

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

David E. Ross wrote: >By the way, the latest W3Schools report now indicates that >more people are now using Gecko browsers than IE. >Of course, the specialized nature of the W3Schools Web site >skews their survey so that it really doesn't reflect >the general audience of Internet users. Well, the

Re: Preferences hangs

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: stan wrote: Using 1.1.16. I go into Preferences within Mail and News. Click Mail and Newsgroups. The options for making SeaMonkey the defaults for mail and news are not checked. I check them and click on OK. It hangs and have to shut down. I am using my new Acer

Re: Preferences hangs

stan wrote: Using 1.1.16. I go into Preferences within Mail and News. Click Mail and Newsgroups. The options for making SeaMonkey the defaults for mail and news are not checked. I check them and click on OK. It hangs and have to shut down. I am using my new Acer computer, 64 bit, Vista.

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

On 6/21/2009 2:41 AM, Daniel wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 6/20/2009 5:00 PM, Nairda wrote: > > > >> Since I >> use Internet Explorer only to get Windows updates and to check my own >> Web pages, I have rejected all .NET Framework (and ActiveX) updates. >> > > Sorry, David! You only use

Re: Preferences hangs

Martin Feitag wrote: stan schrieb: Using 1.1.16. I go into Preferences within Mail and News. Click Mail and Newgroups. The options for making SeaMonkey the defaults for mail and news are not checked. I check them and click on OK. It hangs and have to shut down. I am using my new Acer computer

Re: Preferences hangs

stan schrieb: Using 1.1.16. I go into Preferences within Mail and News. Click Mail and Newgroups. The options for making SeaMonkey the defaults for mail and news are not checked. I check them and click on OK. It hangs and have to shut down. I am using my new Acer computer, 64 bit, Vista. Stan

Preferences hangs

Using 1.1.16. I go into Preferences within Mail and News. Click Mail and Newgroups. The options for making SeaMonkey the defaults for mail and news are not checked. I check them and click on OK. It hangs and have to shut down. I am using my new Acer computer, 64 bit, Vista. Stan __

Re: Is this spam, or what??

Graham wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I see no indication that anything has been stripped out en route (by antivirus software, for example). My local AV log shows nothing, too. So I don't get the point of it... Two things are possible. First, it didn't bounce: your email address has been

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

David E. Ross wrote: On 6/20/2009 5:00 PM, Nairda wrote: Since I use Internet Explorer only to get Windows updates and to check my own Web pages, I have rejected all .NET Framework (and ActiveX) updates. Sorry, David! You only use IE to get updates and check your own webpages. As you us

Re: Firefox 3.5 RC1 is appearing

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Daniel wrote: Lester Caine wrote: JR WG wrote ... And are we really interested in what 'the opposition' are doing :) No, not really, except that it may influence where SM browser goes. Daniel I certainly read that as you contradicting yourself. Yeah!! Now that