Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Matthias Kahlert
Am 17.03.2010 03:34, schrieb Robert Kaiser: SeaMonkey 2.0, which is not only more modern, but also maintained for stability and security problems. Will there be a Seamonkey 2.X version that refrains from duplicating the whole imap mailstore into the profile without explicit consent from the

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread dominique
Matthias Kahlert wrote, On 3/18/2010 8:47 AM: Will there be a Seamonkey 2.X version that refrains from duplicating the whole imap mailstore into the profile without explicit consent from the user? Easy: for each Mail account settings, in synchronization and storage uncheck the keep message

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Robert Kaiser wrote: I don't say why 1.1.19 shouldn't work in every place where 1.1.18 does work. Sorry, typo, I meant: I don't _know_ why 1.1.19 shouldn't work in every place where 1.1.18 does work. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Ant wrote: On 3/16/2010 9:05 PM PT, Leonidas Jones typed: A note for Mac OSX users, SM 1.1.19 does not work on any Mac OSX version prior to Tiger. If you are running Panther or Jaguar, stay with 1.1.18. Wow, how and why did v1.1.19 require higher Mac OS X versions? It's shouldn't. I see no

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Benoit Renard wrote: I find the subject to be inappropriate, considering that it's about the last release of a branch instead of solely the decision to stop support. A better subject would have been: SeaMonkey 1.1.19 released, end of line for 1.x. No, 1.1.19 is the most insignificant part of

Testing For SeaMonkey 2.0.4 - help wanted!

2010-03-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Hi everyone, All the builds for SeaMonkey 2.0.4 have been created (updates are in work right now, will be available on the betatest channel soon, going to beta as soon as I have a few reports of the builds not being busted), so it's time for starting tests on them to ensure we get an update

Re: SM2.1: Workaround for remote timestamp on downloads?

2010-03-18 Thread Oliver Naumann
Oliver Naumann wrote: As proposed in bug 178506, downloaded files are now assigned the last- modified timestamp from the remote server. Nevermind. Luckily, this was really easy to fix with an extension. Oliver ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Error in SM v2.0.3 in this web page?

2010-03-18 Thread Phillip Jones
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bernard Mercier wrote: Paul B. Gallagher a pensé très fort : Bernard Mercier wrote: Paul B. Gallagher a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Bernard Mercier vient de nous annoncer : Phillip Pi a exposé le 3/10/2010 : Hello. Is anyone else getting You do not have the

Re: SM2.1: Workaround for remote timestamp on downloads?

2010-03-18 Thread Oliver Naumann
Bill Davidsen wrote: On Linux/Mac it's less critical, the accessed and changed dates can be used for sorting or searching. Well, this is possibile on Windows as well, at least with the modified and created timestamps. Still, I wouldn't feel stupid at all asking how a file can have been

Re: Testing For SeaMonkey 2.0.4 - help wanted!

2010-03-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Robert Kaiser wrote: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0.4-candidates/build2/ Sorry, wrong URL. The right one is here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0.4-candidates/build1/ Robert Kaiser ___

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Matthias Kahlert
Am 2010-03-18 14:47, schrieb Robert Kaiser: Matthias Kahlert wrote: Will there be a Seamonkey 2.X version that refrains from duplicating the whole imap mailstore into the profile without explicit consent from the user? By default, we'll always download all messages to the local machine from

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Leonidas Jones
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 3/17/2010 12:05 AM, Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: In January 2006, SeaMonkey 1.0 was released, a 1.1 release followed a year later. Another three years later, the SeaMonkey project is discontinuing support for the SeaMonkey 1.x series today in favor

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Leonidas Jones
Rufus wrote: Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: In January 2006, SeaMonkey 1.0 was released, a 1.1 release followed a year later. Another three years later, the SeaMonkey project is discontinuing support for the SeaMonkey 1.x series today in favor of SeaMonkey 2.0, which is not only more

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Leonidas Jones
Leonidas Jones wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 3/17/2010 12:05 AM, Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: In January 2006, SeaMonkey 1.0 was released, a 1.1 release followed a year later. Another three years later, the SeaMonkey project is discontinuing support for the SeaMonkey 1.x

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Matthias Kahlert wrote: Shouldn't the user be asked (or at least be informed) if he wants to pay the price of duplicating his complete mailstore for this global search? It is a pref after all, the user can set it differently. But by default, downloading is on, and for the vast majority of

Re: Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped

2010-03-18 Thread Leonidas Jones
Leonidas Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 3/17/2010 12:05 AM, Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: In January 2006, SeaMonkey 1.0 was released, a 1.1 release followed a year later. Another three years later, the SeaMonkey project is discontinuing