Mike wrote:
I've never liked the change in filtering for SM 2.0. Previously when I
typed in a name or word in the filter/search field above the mail list,
it would only search the sender and subjects of the email. Now the
results include the search data from from other area's. Is this
something
Mike wrote:
I've never liked the change in filtering for SM 2.0. Previously when I
typed in a name or word in the filter/search field above the mail list,
it would only search the sender and subjects of the email. Now the
results include the search data from from other area's. Is this
something
MCBastos wrote:
Things are slightly better on the Mozilla front -- but I still find LOTS
of users using FF 3.6.x (and not always the latest update), a fair
number using FF 3.5, a few using FF 3.0, and now and then one using FF
2. So, there's quite a bunch of old Mozilla around. Not as much or
On 03.06.2011 23:45, MCBastos wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Interviewed by CNN on 04/06/2011 00:14, Jay Garcia told the world:
On 03.06.2011 20:49, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia wrote:
If Mozilla is the only one supplying the updates then how do you
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Hrm are you sure, it seems to only search Subject/Sender for me. (Though
I'm not deeply vested in the mailnews code to verify from that end for
you). I know Thunderbird has what they call gloda for search, which we
do not use [yet, if ever].
But I would be sure that
Stefan Sitter ha scritto:
Francesco Presel wrote:
I have been using the latest-comm-central builds on SM2.1 rc1
(linux x64; I've also used lightning x64), without any problems.
I've noticed, though, that there's no l10n version for lightning
miramar for linux x64 (whereas, there is an English
Francesco Presel wrote:
BTW, is my UA correct (I've read somewhere that there were problems
with the seamonkey UA and lightning)? Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1
Lightning/1.0b4pre
Yes, this was fixed with the 2011-06-04 Lightning nightly
Jay Garcia wrote:
Thanks, we already know how this works. What we're speaking of here
is that Mozilla is contemplating silent updates where no user input
is required.
Currently, I have to click a button to approve a proposed update --
you're thinking of doing away with this option, or making
Hi,
Is there anyway to use sync bookmarks addon with SM 2.0.14 ? Right now
I have FF installed then I import the syn'd bookmarks from FF to SM...
thanks
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 04.06.2011 11:08, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia wrote:
Thanks, we already know how this works. What we're speaking of here
is that Mozilla is contemplating silent updates where no user input
is required.
Currently, I have to click a button to approve a
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 04.06.2011 11:08, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Thanks, we already know how this works. What we're speaking of
here is that Mozilla is contemplating silent updates where no
user input is required.
Currently, I have to click a button to approve a proposed
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 03.06.2011 20:08, PhillipJones wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-06-03 4:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Although not new to computers I am fairly new to SeaMonkey. I am using
version 2.0.14. There has been a lot of chat about the
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
If Mozilla is the only one supplying the updates then how do you
figure that's a dangerous move, i.e., How is malware,etc. going to
get injected into a Mozilla-0nly supplied update? By your thinking,
Microsoft automatic updates are also dangerous.
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/06/2011 00:14, Jay Garcia told the world:
On 03.06.2011 20:49, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia wrote:
If Mozilla is the only one supplying the updates then how do you
figure that's a dangerous move, i.e., How is
On 04.06.2011 16:07, PhillipJones wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
If Mozilla is the only one supplying the updates then how do you
figure that's a dangerous move, i.e., How is malware,etc. going to
get injected into a Mozilla-0nly supplied
Interviewed by CNN on 04/06/2011 19:20, Ray_Net told the world:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.6.16 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
Sometimes when opening a pdf file a message from Adobe came on
asking if a agree an upgrade
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.6.16 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
Sometimes when opening a pdf file a message from Adobe came on
asking if a agree an upgrade to Acrobat Version X may i let this
installation to be done
On 6/4/11 3:20 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.6.16 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
Sometimes when opening a pdf file a message from Adobe came on
asking if a agree an upgrade to Acrobat Version X may
On 04/06/11 19:33, goldtech wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to use sync bookmarks addon with SM 2.0.14 ? Right now
I have FF installed then I import the syn'd bookmarks from FF to SM...
thanks
AFAIK there is no clean way to use Sync with SeaMonkey 2.0.x, but
SeaMonkey 2.1 will have Sync
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 04.06.2011 16:07, PhillipJones wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
If Mozilla is the only one supplying the updates then how do you
figure that's a dangerous move, i.e., How is malware,etc. going to
get injected into a
20 matches
Mail list logo
