Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread GerardJan
Libertarian Lilly wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote : GerardJan wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab, isn't that WAY excessive? good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory sincerely, Huh? 41megs >> 4Mbyte No, 41 m

Re: View of the mailbox has changed with 2.9.1

2012-05-17 Thread Daniel
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Daniel wrote: Maciej, what you have to do is set SM up as you want it and then get SM to save that setting. Click on the little SeaMonkey icon up in the top left of the SM screen and there should be an option there to save settings or similar. HTH You mean the one t

Verizon Connection...

2012-05-17 Thread NO
Hello all, I Am using SM 2.91 on Vista Business in a Lenovo T61 Laptop. Starting last week I began having challenges connecting to get or send email through VZ. Timing out before sending or receiving is the issue. My yahoo and gmail accounts are all fine and responsive. I have made all of the

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Libertarian Lilly wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote : GerardJan wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab, isn't that WAY excessive? good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory sincerely, Huh? 41megs>> 4Mbyte No, 41 m

Re: Verizon Connection...

2012-05-17 Thread hawker
On 5/17/2012 7:29 AM, NO wrote: Hello all, I Am using SM 2.91 on Vista Business in a Lenovo T61 Laptop. Starting last week I began having challenges connecting to get or send email through VZ. Timing out before sending or receiving is the issue. My yahoo and gmail accounts are all fine and resp

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote : GerardJan wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab, isn't that WAY excessive? good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory sincerely, Huh? 41me

SM 2.9.1 color scheme

2012-05-17 Thread W3BNR
I accomplished two things this last week: 1. New Computer - now running Windows 7 2. Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a drop-down menu or an item in the drop-down menu the text changes to white and the background is th

Re: Verizon Connection...

2012-05-17 Thread W3BNR
On 5/17/2012 9:59 AM hawker submitted the following: > On 5/17/2012 7:29 AM, NO wrote: >> Hello all, I Am using SM 2.91 on Vista Business in a Lenovo T61 Laptop. >> >> Starting last week I began having challenges connecting to get or send >> email through VZ. Timing out before sending or receiving

Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen
W3BNR wrote: I accomplished two things this last week: 1. New Computer - now running Windows 7 2. Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a drop-down menu or an item in the drop-down menu the text changes to white and the b

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Rufus
Ed Mullen wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote : GerardJan wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab, isn't that WAY excessive? good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory sinc

Re: Painfully slow graphics rendering

2012-05-17 Thread Craig
NoOp wrote: I like those prices better than the San Franciso prices :-) Indeed! With Opera running at the same time& both browsers on the same page, Opera register about 0.3 cpu& about 12% memory: However... I can easily get Opera up to 41/12: simply by scrolling through the

Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme

2012-05-17 Thread W3BNR
On 5/17/2012 2:28 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following: > W3BNR wrote: >> I accomplished two things this last week: >> 1. New Computer - now running Windows 7 >> 2. Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer >> >> Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a >> drop-down

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory, how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it? If he has only 4 MB of RAM, he's running a wristwatch, not a computer. He must've meant 4 GB. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallaghe

Off-topic : Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: If he has only 4 MB of RAM, he's running a wristwatch, not a computer. He must've meant 4 GB. 4Mb is /massive/, man : the first computer on which I worked had 8K ! (Clary 404, sequential architecture, but a very powerful instruction set : one of my 3rd- year student

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Ed Mullen wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote : GerardJan wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab, isn't that WAY excessive? good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory sinc

Re: [Suggestions]

2012-05-17 Thread gjikkl
Philip Chee wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:59:12 -0400, gjikkl wrote: * Include SunBird in SeaMonkey. Lightning (Sunbird as an extension) is available for SeaMonkey: https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/lightning/ (And has been for quite a while. Phil I know but I don't want it that wa

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen
Rufus wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote : GerardJan wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab, isn't that WAY excessive? good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physica

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote : GerardJan wrote: Libertarian Lilly wrote: Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab, isn't that WAY excessive? good enough for me, i have 4