MCBastos wrote:
To Paul Gallagher:
Making the "Read" and "Junk Status" columns gives a few benefits
beyond simply seeing the message status.
First, there's easy sorting, of course. Just click on the column
header and all your unread messages will bunch together at one end. I
find this useful w
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:50:54 -0600
Jane Galt wrote:
> WOuld like to request this feature in SM.
>
> Google had a blocked sites feature that didn't work out, and I
> imagine the reason was that it couldn't use text strings to
> successfully do so.
>
> Example, I want to block ALL of pricegrabber
Roger Fink wrote:
I'm relatively new to the seamonkey newsreader and I'm trying to make
peace with it. I'm just about there except for one feature I need, and
that is a way to distinguish read from unread posts. Among the
user-selectable column headers there is a category, "read", which when
chec
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 22:15, Roger Fink told the world:
>
>
> Original Message
>> I'm relatively new to the seamonkey newsreader and I'm trying to make
>> peace with it. I'm just about there except for one feature I need, and
>> that is a way to distinguish read from
Roger Fink wrote:
This is somewhat OT, but until there was a follow up to my last reply,
the thread had completely disappeared from the thread list, although it
did show up in a message (subject) search using "seamonkey newsreader".
Now that there has been a follow-up post, the entire thread ha
On 03/05/2013 10:36 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/5/13 4:28 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
question wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
When Java 7u11 was blocklisted, I enabled it (click-to-play) for three
Web sites. How do I now cancel that click-to-play enabling?
7u11 is still Blocklisted
7u11 thr
WaltS wrote:
> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>
>>> I've got it limited to 300 messages max for each newsgroup, which is
>>> plenty for me. If I set it up the way I intended, then as new messages
>>> are posted, the oldest ones disappear. The message count for each
>>> newsgroup sho
This is somewhat OT, but until there was a follow up to my last reply,
the thread had completely disappeared from the thread list, although it
did show up in a message (subject) search using "seamonkey newsreader".
Now that there has been a follow-up post, the entire thread has
reappeared. I
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jane Galt wrote:
WOuld like to request this feature in SM.
Google had a blocked sites feature that didn't work out, and I imagine
the
reason was that it couldn't use text strings to successfully do so.
Example, I want to block ALL of pricegrabber.com from my search re
On 03/05/2013 10:36 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/5/13 4:28 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
question wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
When Java 7u11 was blocklisted, I enabled it (click-to-play) for three
Web sites. How do I now cancel that click-to-play enabling?
7u11 is still Blocklisted
7u11 thr
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>
>> I've got it limited to 300 messages max for each newsgroup, which is
>> plenty for me. If I set it up the way I intended, then as new messages
>> are posted, the oldest ones disappear. The message count for each
>> newsgroup shown in the folder pan
On 3/5/13 4:28 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
> question wrote:
>> David E. Ross wrote:
>>> When Java 7u11 was blocklisted, I enabled it (click-to-play) for three
>>> Web sites. How do I now cancel that click-to-play enabling?
>>>
>> 7u11 is still Blocklisted
>> 7u11 thru 7u15 Blocklisted since Mond
Roger Fink wrote:
> I've got it limited to 300 messages max for each newsgroup, which is
> plenty for me. If I set it up the way I intended, then as new messages
> are posted, the oldest ones disappear. The message count for each
> newsgroup shown in the folder pane hovers around 300, seeming t
Original Message
Roger Fink wrote:
I'm relatively new to the seamonkey newsreader and I'm trying to make
peace with it. I'm just about there except for one feature I need,
and that is a way to distinguish read from unread posts. Among the
user-selectable column headers the
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
I'm relatively new to the seamonkey newsreader and I'm trying to make
peace with it. I'm just about there except for one feature I need, and
that is a way to distinguish read from unread posts. Among the
user-selectable column headers there
Roger Fink wrote:
I'm relatively new to the seamonkey newsreader and I'm trying to make
peace with it. I'm just about there except for one feature I need,
and that is a way to distinguish read from unread posts. Among the
user-selectable column headers there is a category, "read", which
when ch
Original Message
I'm relatively new to the seamonkey newsreader and I'm trying to make
peace with it. I'm just about there except for one feature I need, and
that is a way to distinguish read from unread posts. Among the
user-selectable column headers there is a category, "rea
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
wrote:
Not really answering your question, but why do you think going from
10.x to 11.x is a downgrade?
Going from Adobe Acrobat (any version) to Adobe Reader (any version)
is a major downgrade.
Philip Taylor
You can replace the reader without affecting the rest of
Jane Galt wrote:
WOuld like to request this feature in SM.
Google had a blocked sites feature that didn't work out, and I imagine the
reason was that it couldn't use text strings to successfully do so.
Example, I want to block ALL of pricegrabber.com from my search results,
because they give n
I'm relatively new to the seamonkey newsreader and I'm trying to make
peace with it. I'm just about there except for one feature I need, and
that is a way to distinguish read from unread posts. Among the
user-selectable column headers there is a category, "read", which when
checked displays a g
WOuld like to request this feature in SM.
Google had a blocked sites feature that didn't work out, and I imagine the
reason was that it couldn't use text strings to successfully do so.
Example, I want to block ALL of pricegrabber.com from my search results,
because they give nothing but useless
question wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
When Java 7u11 was blocklisted, I enabled it (click-to-play) for three
Web sites. How do I now cancel that click-to-play enabling?
7u11 is still Blocklisted
7u11 thru 7u15 Blocklisted since Monday
All because The ALMIGHTY FACEBOOK Got HACKED
To protect
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 15:09, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:
> Updated my full Adobe Acrobat program to v. 10.1.6 on February 15, runs
> fine.
>
> SM/FF plugins check says my plugin is out of date, offers to downgrade
> me to Acrobat Reader 11.0.02.
>
> Is my full program really vu
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 13:53, PhillipJones told the world:
> MCBastos wrote:
>> Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
>>
>>> had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
>>> failed miserably on Firefox 20.
>>
>> Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising tha
Roger Fink wrote:
> I understand that the "relationship" between the two is just an accident
> of language, or careless use of language, but the sequence of events was
> hard to miss and Win7 system restore did what it was supposed to do.
> Everything is fine now except that I'm back to the old
BIll Spikowski wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Updated my full Adobe Acrobat program to v. 10.1.6 on February 15, runs
fine.
SM/FF plugins check says my plugin is out of date, offers to downgrade
me to Acrobat Reader 11.0.02.
Is my full program really vulnerable, do I really need to downgrade
Original Message
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was
wrote:
> Not really answering your question, but why do you think going from
> 10.x to 11.x is a downgrade?
Going from Adobe Acrobat (any version) to Adobe Reader (any version)
is a major downgrade.
Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
su
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Updated my full Adobe Acrobat program to v. 10.1.6 on February 15, runs
fine.
SM/FF plugins check says my plugin is out of date, offers to downgrade
me to Acrobat Reader 11.0.02.
Is my full program really vulnerable, do I really need to downgrade to
the Reader?
Or can
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Updated my full Adobe Acrobat program to v. 10.1.6 on February 15, runs
> fine.
>
> SM/FF plugins check says my plugin is out of date, offers to downgrade
> me to Acrobat Reader 11.0.02.
>
> Is my full program really vulnerable, do I really need to downgrade to
> the
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was una
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 09:47, MCBastos told the world:
By the way, there's a new Java out. Again. It seems Oracle never runs
out of holes to patch...
Addendum: they even updated Java 6, AFTER they said they wouldn't do
that anymore... must be a pretty embarrassing bu
Updated my full Adobe Acrobat program to v. 10.1.6 on February 15, runs
fine.
SM/FF plugins check says my plugin is out of date, offers to downgrade
me to Acrobat Reader 11.0.02.
Is my full program really vulnerable, do I really need to downgrade to
the Reader?
Or can I just update the plu
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
failed miserably on Firefox 20.
Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising that it didn't get a 100.
here's what it looked like on FireFox 20.05 (Think that's
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
failed miserably on Firefox 20.
Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising that it didn't get a 100.
here's what it looked like on FireFox 20.05 (Think that's
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
> had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
> failed miserably on Firefox 20.
Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising that it didn't get a 100.
>
> here's what it looked like on FireFox 20.05 (Think that's the latest
>
On 3/5/13 3:28 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>
>> When I delete a cookie, there is a checkbox that -- if checked --
>> prevents its domain from setting any future cookies. Does this checkbox
>> have a preference variable?
>
> Not to my knowledge. Why should it, as it
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I reverted back to 1.7.0.15.
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I reverted back to 1.7.0.15.
Original Message
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I revert
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
> FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
> also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
> experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
>
> I reverted back to 1.7.0.15.
>
I d
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I reverted back to 1.7.0.15.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
sup
David E. Ross wrote:
When I delete a cookie, there is a checkbox that -- if checked --
prevents its domain from setting any future cookies. Does this
checkbox have a preference variable?
Are you asking whether this particular domain setting will show up in
about:config? No; that will show up
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 09:47, MCBastos told the world:
> By the way, there's a new Java out. Again. It seems Oracle never runs
> out of holes to patch...
>
Addendum: they even updated Java 6, AFTER they said they wouldn't do
that anymore... must be a pretty embarrassing bug.
--
MCBast
By the way, there's a new Java out. Again. It seems Oracle never runs
out of holes to patch...
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Barbie Dream Computer.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 runni
David E. Ross wrote:
> When I delete a cookie, there is a checkbox that -- if checked --
> prevents its domain from setting any future cookies. Does this checkbox
> have a preference variable?
Not to my knowledge. Why should it, as it is by domain? If you UNcheck the
box for a particular domain
Hi,
Since about a week ago, some e-mails show up incorrectly in my SeaMonkey
(2.16 on Win7 64 bit).
Checking the source for two e-mails, one showing correctly and one
incorrectly, I see no difference regarding content encoding.
They look like this (source):
47 matches
Mail list logo
