On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 2:59:19 PM UTC-7, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 5/12/18 5:32 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> You simply need to use a different user agent string when going to
> >> chase.com. Add this to your prefs.js:
> >>
> >> user_pref("general.useragent.override.chase.com",
On 5/12/18, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 5/12/18 5:32 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote:
>>>
>>> You simply need to use a different user agent string when going to
>>> chase.com. Add this to your prefs.js:
>>>
>>> user_pref("general.useragent.override.chase.com", "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
>>> NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:5
On 5/12/18 5:32 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote:
You simply need to use a different user agent string when going to
chase.com. Add this to your prefs.js:
user_pref("general.useragent.override.chase.com", "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/50.0");
A favor,
> >
> >
>
> You simply need to use a different user agent string when going to
> chase.com. Add this to your prefs.js:
>
> user_pref("general.useragent.override.chase.com", "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
> NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/50.0");
A favor, please. I see reference
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
Paul, I like your signature a lot
--
https://facebook.com/gerardjan.vinkesteijn
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100
Lloyd Frazier wrote:
I have listened to people, complaining about Internet browsers, for
decades. One of my computers, has a great processor, great memory
(RAM), and a solid operating system, so I load many Internet
browsers, to see which are decent. I am retired, at a young age, but
I was Cha
Ray_Net wrote:
> Why must TB or SM show a part of the HTML part when reading exclusively
> in plain-text.
> If you position your option to plain-text-only don't expect to reach the
> HTML part ...
> Permitting to access the html part is an aberration ...
>
> If you want to see the attachment Iphon
rogihil...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody any clues on how to get rid of this virus. It blocks access to the
google search engine, although it allows access to Bing. It started with
version 2.48 today on startup. I have updated to 2.49 but it still appears.
When one enters the google search engine u
On 5/11/18, rogihil...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, 11 May 2018 22:09:45 UTC+1, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
>> rogihil...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > Anybody any clues on how to get rid of this virus. It blocks access to
>> > the google search engine, although it allows access to Bing. It started
>> >
rogihil...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody any clues on how to get rid of this virus. It blocks access to the
google search engine, although it allows access to Bing. It started with
version 2.48 today on startup. I have updated to 2.49 but it still appears.
When one enters the google search engine u
Daniel,
I have listened to people, complaining about Internet browsers, for decades.
One of my computers, has a great processor, great memory (RAM), and a solid
operating system, so I load many Internet browsers, to see which are decent. I
am retired, at a young age, but I was Chairman, and C
Lloyd Frazier wrote on 12/05/18 11:28:
When you talk about browsers, on Microsoft Windows 10 Home, Version: 1803, OS
build: 17134.48, with 16 GB of Installed memory (RAM), I have these browsers
loaded, with current browser updates, and all browsers work properly, except
for Microsoft Edge 41.1
On Friday, 11 May 2018 22:46:17 UTC+1, rogih...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, 11 May 2018 22:44:27 UTC+1, rogih...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, 11 May 2018 22:09:45 UTC+1, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
> > > rogihil...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Anybody any clues on how to get rid of this virus. I
I experienced a similar issue once when I was assigned an IP by my cable
provider which was probably previously used to send spam or was blacklisted.
I would also check the router. Might have been highjacked.
FRG
WaltS48 wrote:
On 5/11/18 2:36 PM, rogihil...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody any clues
> Wincrap 10... I thought that we had moved past name calling.
For 10 I make an exception. Microsoft took all the bad things from Linux
without the good ones. And instead of fixing bugs news ones are introduced
together with useless crap and privacy intrusive spying. This one is just
paving th
15 matches
Mail list logo