On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:16:38 -0400, Cruz, Jaime wrote: > The add-on authors seem to be having difficulties keeping up with the > upgrade cycle, and several add-ons I count on aren't yet compatible with > 2.2 (they just BARELY got compatibility with 2.1). This really is a > STUPID decision on the part of the Mozilla organization. > > And now I've got this damn thing nagging me to upgrade when I CAN'T yet. > > Time to start looking at Opera and/or Chrome if this nonsense keeps up.
Yes, I've had three problems with FF, all of which *seem* to have been cured by removing openSUSE add-ons and branding. All seems rather unnecessary work for the user. What really irritates me is all this rush to add new features when there are plenty of problems lying around needing to be fixed. Get the basics working before adding more stuff and running the risk of introducing more bugs. One TB bug I was tracking, and am still getting the odd bugzilla e- mail about, dates back to the last millennium! We don't all want bleeding-edge software, we want reliability. Mind you, when looking for alternatives, they all seem to have big problems and TB/FF may be the least worst of the bunch. -- Graham Davis, UK User of Mozillarish stuff since Netscape 1.2N. Running KDE 4.6.5 on openSUSE 11.4. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
