Re: SeaMonkey v2.49.1 is out!

Ant wrote: Well almost! https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/11/04/2-49-1-is-out/ https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/11/04/404-error/ Maybe more in https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/ soon. Great release! Getting strange CPU spikes when opening javascript-intense pages. Also, after a f

Re: "Authentication Failed" When Retrieving eMail, SM 2.48, W10 Pro 64

Bo1953 wrote: Hello all, Having challenges retrieving emails into SM 2.48. The error message is as follows: Sending of password for user x...@techson.net did not succeed. Mail server beast.noc.com responded: Authentication failed. Is this a server side error or SM error? I can retrieve email

Re: Cannot access microsoft support page

Ray_Net wrote: The page: https://support.microsoft.com/en-ie/help/4038788/windows-10-update-kb4038788 Is OK when I use Internet-Explorer. But when I use SM I got: Unresponsive script with the following info: A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can sto

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: They still have a lot of money to burn. Market share in 5 to 6 months should show if it is a success. I have my doubts. If you p*ss off enough power users who recommend it to others not much left. "Normal" users will just continue using Chrome. They don't care about pr

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

WaltS48 wrote: On 9/10/17 11:04 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I probably need to do a Fx Nightly again just to see what changed but this is all so much urgkkk for only fanboys to love. This is all rushed and I personally hope it backfires but even this would do SeaMonkey no good. Do you real

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

tly again just to see what changed but this is all so much urgkkk for only fanboys to love. This is all rushed and I personally hope it backfires but even this would do SeaMonkey no good. Building 2.49.1 should atart soon. Everything has been checked in now. A little late but we do what we can with th

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I have a pacthes up 2.54 but it still needs at least two bugs fixed before I would call it usable. I am using a 2.53 with a few fixes still in review applied. If you want it shoot me a mail Can bake any platform but Linux i686. FRG TCW wrote: On 9/7/2017 1:26 PM, S S

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

pconde wrote: Thanks, I checked Firefox and its is the X86-64 version "Architecture :x86_64 Package source : MozillaFirefox-50.1.0-1.1 Media No. :1" You are right that the Kpart plugins is not activated in Firefox. I didn't found in the plugins or extension of Firefox anything related to pdf

Re: SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

John Duncan wrote: John Duncan wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: John Duncan wrote: John Duncan wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: followup error from the above. Is it? Seems unrelated to the aArguments error, but maybe I'm missing something. Should go away in a new build. Didn&#

Re: SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

John Duncan wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: John Duncan wrote: John Duncan wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: followup error from the above. Is it? Seems unrelated to the aArguments error, but maybe I'm missing something. Should go away in a new build. Didn't look into it to

Re: SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: John Duncan wrote: John Duncan wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: followup error from the above. Is it? Seems unrelated to the aArguments error, but maybe I'm missing something. Should go away in a new build. Didn't look into it too hard but something w

Re: SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

John Duncan wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: John Duncan wrote: 2.50 seems to be running much better than 2.46 release, from what I can tell. Try 2.49a2 instead. It will be the next ESR release and probably will become the standard release till 2018. Worst case it might also be the last

Re: SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: John Duncan wrote: 2.50 seems to be running much better than 2.46 release, from what I can tell. Try 2.49a2 instead. It will be the next ESR release and probably will become the standard release till 2018. Worst case it might also be the last one if the XUL and

Re: SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

John Duncan wrote: 2.50 seems to be running much better than 2.46 release, from what I can tell. I have had big problems over the past couple of days with 2.46, wherein each time I loaded a web page, CPU usage would jump to 100% and last 2-3 seconds after the page had finished loading

SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

2.50 seems to be running much better than 2.46 release, from what I can tell. I have had big problems over the past couple of days with 2.46, wherein each time I loaded a web page, CPU usage would jump to 100% and last 2-3 seconds after the page had finished loading. Deleting places.sqlite fixe

Re: SM 2.46 Silverlight plugin/DRM support

John Duncan wrote: Any news on whether or not SeaMonkey will support Google Widevine CDM at any point in the near future? It's a shame that I can no longer watch netflix in SeaMonkey 2.46. I have decided to instead just use the nightly version of SM 2.50, which still allows plugins (other

SM 2.46 Silverlight plugin/DRM support

Any news on whether or not SeaMonkey will support Google Widevine CDM at any point in the near future? It's a shame that I can no longer watch netflix in SeaMonkey 2.46. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lis

Re: Mnenhy with 2.46

Jonathan N. Little wrote: Didn't someone post a fix for Mnenhy with 2.46? I thought I saw it but cannot find the post. Had a bit of a panic because it messed up my header panel which interfered with Enigmail decoding message in one of my accounts... >FWIW, mnenhy already displays Xface >Take a

Re: 2.46 version

Edmund Wong wrote: Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach? Edmund I think he's ref

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Use the force (or google search). Known bug. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881 for a workaround. Or open Sidebar. Set search engine and do one search from there. Default engine should be set to this one then. FRG John Duncan wrote: EE

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

EE wrote: cmcadams wrote: I've just installed SM2.46, and discovered that the engine pick list in Edit > Preferences > Browser > Internet Search isn't working. I got my choice by deleting all the alternatives, which becomes the new unchangeable option even if you then Restore Defaults. Not a

Re: SeaMonkey v2.46 Build number 8 blog...

Ant wrote: On 12/13/2016 12:02 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/13/build-number-7/ https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/13/build-8/ Sounds promising! Hang in there, guys; your work is highly appreciated. What exactly is the problem with the Lightning/DOM Ins

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

Mason83 wrote: On 22/11/2016 15:54, TCW wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:08:09 +0100, Mason83 wrote: On 20/11/2016 20:50, Mason83 wrote: On 20/11/2016 20:47, Mason83 wrote: On 20/11/2016 20:44, Mason83 wrote: 2) When I display an email or NG message, the header pane was empty. Removing the M

Re: Good news for adventurous MAC - SeaMonkey - users ...

EE wrote: Rainer Bielefeld wrote: ... you can find here . Best regards Rainer Exactly where is the Mac release? I could not find it. All I could find was the notice about it. https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-rele

Re: Lightning Add-on no longer available for SeaMonkey?

NoOp wrote: Is Lightning no longer available for SeaMonkey 2.40? Went to update/install on a system and ran into "Not available for SeaMOnkey 2.40" see: What's up with that? Does every new SeaMonkey 2.40 user now need to go to:

Re: Seamonkey and Netflix

JAS wrote: Running SM 2.40 on Win 7 machine. Latest Silverlight and Adblock Plus is disabled. User Agentis set in about:config with -- general.useragent.override.netflix.com;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 Can not connect to watch Netflix and just get a bl

Re: Newsgroup Disconnect

David E. Ross wrote: On 4/8/2016 9:37 PM, OG wrote: I use two providers to look at the same newsgroups. I boot the laptop and Seamonkey updates the newsgroups. I let the app sit all day open so that I can get the latest updates when I return. But seamonkey refuses to look at either provider gi

Re: Macintosh El Capitan compatible?

Gini Moore wrote: Just wondering if Sea Monkey works on El Capitan? Donʻt want to upgrade if it doesnʻt. Yes, it works fine. Using 2.40 on 10.11.3 right now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla

Re: Seamonkey 2.40?

Paul Bergsagel wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: It's been awhile, and Firefox has already had multiple releases since Seamonkey 2.39. What's the story? I believe SeaMonkey 2.40 is presently in the works. The programmer in charge of compiling the code broke his arm (I think?), so there is a delay in

Re: New problems printing draft emails

Bill Spikowski wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: I recently upgraded SM from 2.26 to 2.39 and have noticed a new problem (across several computers and OS's). When I'm composing an email, I often print a draft -- because I can proofread better on paper than on the screen. I no longer can print using

Re: Download Video?

»Q« wrote: In , "David E. Ross" wrote: My daughter posted videos of my granddaughter on YouTube. How can I download these to save with photos of my granddaughter? will do it, bu

Re: Cookie or sniffing issue:?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I'm trying to renew my vehicle registration with the Pennsylvania Department of Motor Vehicles (PennDOT), but the site seems to be broken in a way I can't figure out (I've done this for 10 years running and it's never been a problem until now). And the gist of PennDOT's r

Re: 2.39 and system hanging

John Duncan wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, Is it just me, or does 2.39 hang a lot? Especially with getting email? After clicking get messages, it'd download the stuff, and then hang for about ten seconds or so and then resume (after switching windows on me). Like say I am in the 3

Re: 2.39 and system hanging

Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, Is it just me, or does 2.39 hang a lot? Especially with getting email? After clicking get messages, it'd download the stuff, and then hang for about ten seconds or so and then resume (after switching windows on me). Like say I am in the 3-pane message window. I click

Re: Netflix SM 2.39

BL wrote: Since SeaMonkey update to 2.39 I have problem with Netflix. Movie selection loads normally but playback stays at black screen and no sound. I reinstalled Silverlight but problem remains. Netflix plays normally on FF and IE.Any ideas?? Thank You BL Same here! Using Silverlight 5.1.4

Re: SeaMonkey 2.39b1 released

Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.39b1! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.39b1 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to

Re: SeaMoneky 2.38 is out of date

Ray_Net wrote: John Duncan wrote on 19/10/2015 05:33: Marisa Ciceran wrote: Others have probably already reported this, so please forgive me if I am being repetitive. Once again, JPMorgan Chase Bank (http://chase.com) does not recognize Seamonkey version 2.38. When I go to their Home page, it

Re: SeaMoneky 2.38 is out of date

Marisa Ciceran wrote: Others have probably already reported this, so please forgive me if I am being repetitive. Once again, JPMorgan Chase Bank (http://chase.com) does not recognize Seamonkey version 2.38. When I go to their Home page, it states: Please upgrade your browser. Your brow

Re: Is 360 degrees YouTube videos supposed to work in SeaMonkey?

David E. Ross wrote: On 10/8/2015 9:06 AM, Ant wrote: Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WERjL-mpPQ even with HTML5 working. It didn't work in both of my Linux/Debian oldstable and Windows XP Pro SP3 boxes. It works in Chrome though! Thank you in advance. :) YouTube apparently sniffs

Re: Color Preferences

David E. Ross wrote: What do the different settings of the preference variable browser.display.document_color_use mean? This variable is not documented at . Cross-posted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey and mozilla.support.seamonkey Followup-To: moz

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

Mason83 wrote: On 26/09/2015 13:43, Ant wrote: On 9/25/2015 1:27 PM, Mason83 wrote: http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/23/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-and-now-adblock-plus-uses-a-lot-less-memory/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77999 https://blog.mozilla.org/nnethercot

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38 released

Philipp van Hüllen wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38! When running SM 2.38b1 - is there any reason to switch to 2.38? (I think to remember, that earlier on the last beta was practically equal to the release version - not 100%

Re: SeaMonkey 2.35..

Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, I regret to be the bearer of bad news; but as it stands, the worst case scenario (and likely the actual case) is that 2.35 is not going to be released in July. The new goal is to release it in early August. The past month has been mired in fire-fighting bustages, getting

Re: Add Mail Account

David Guymer wrote: Is there a way to add a mail account with the corrupted mail/news wizard that is a known fault for SeaMonkey 2.33.1 Windows 7 Home Premium (Soon to be Windows 10) TIA David G Yes, go to your about:config page and search for `mail.identity.idX.valid' and see if any of them a

Re: Flash plug-in

rjkrjk wrote: follow the link to adobe, and d/l current version 1800 209 Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 7/14/2015 12:27 AM: Paul Bergsagel wrote: I got the message in SeaMonkey "Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with caution" yesterday and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in. Today

Re: SeaMonkey Update Fails Because A 2nd Copy Is Running ???

Rick Merrill wrote: HenriK wrote on 07/12/2015 4:58 PM: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: HenriK wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: HenriK wrote: In trying to update a copy of SM v.2.30 to the latest version on a Win7Home Premium PC, the update fails and an error message is returned claiming a 2nd vers

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Danny Kile wrote: Mason83 wrote: On 08/07/2015 05:05, Paul Bergsagel wrote: Maybe the time has come to reconsider how often SeaMonkey needs to be updated. Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update schedule would the

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Edmund Wong wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer stick with SM. Kind of sad since I've been with it sinc

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Ray_Net wrote: How can I change my UA string from: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 to: Mozilla/9.0 (Windows NT 10.1; rv:99.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/99.0 ? You can either install an extension

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Ray_Net wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 08/07/2015 01:08: Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer stick with S

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

Daniel wrote: On 8/07/2015 5:55 AM, John Duncan wrote: To fix this, couldn't we try always reporting the Firefox/x.x bit at the end of the UA string to deal with invalid sniffing? or is that not the issue in this circumstance? Yes, you could, John, but then no-one will ever know abo

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

Daniel wrote: On 8/07/2015 6:09 AM, John Duncan wrote: EE wrote: Daniel wrote: and, Jonathan and others, just FYI, it's my belief that if the sniffers sniffed for the term "Gecko" rather than the actual name then they would accept Firefox, SeaMonkey and Opera (and probabl

Re: "We plan to release SeaMonkey 2.35 asap in July."

Yamo' wrote: Hi, WaltS48 a écrit le 06/07/2015 15:49 : Try 2.39a1 at the bottom of this page. [Index of /pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk](http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/) I didn't found Lightlink version for 2.39

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Paul in Houston, TX wrote: cmcadams wrote: I keep multiple partition backups on an external disk, and if something happens, usually because of something I did, I can revert without much angst. Saves needing to get fancy. I've never had anything get beyond a boot partition, that I know of. But i

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

EE wrote: Daniel wrote: and, Jonathan and others, just FYI, it's my belief that if the sniffers sniffed for the term "Gecko" rather than the actual name then they would accept Firefox, SeaMonkey and Opera (and probably others), at a minimum Opera uses Webkit, so why would a sniffer accept it b

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

David E. Ross wrote: On 7/5/2015 11:26 PM, Ray_Net wrote: A site, telling me that my browser is not up-to-date direct me here: http://browsehappy.com/?locale=fr Where in cannot find SeaMonkey This is the result of invalid user-agent sniffing. See my

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:07:19 +0200, Ray_Net wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote on 07/07/2015 15:48: On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 02:43:58 -0400, Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an

Re: Contributed or real version - definitions? --was [Re: "We plan to release SeaMonkey 2.35 asap in July."]

Daniel wrote: On 6/07/2015 9:41 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: Daniel wrote: On 6/07/2015 5:36 PM, Yamo' wrote: Yamo' a écrit le 06/07/2015 09:19 : I didn't found any 2.35b1-candidates on : Or alpha? As SM 2.35 is going to be a Cont