Daniel wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan):
Why is HTML 'okay' in RSS but not in email or news? I view
everything in
HTML (always have) and have no problems.
Do you see then the exactly under the 'okay'? ;)
Hartmut
No, its
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan):
So? Still does not explain or give any reasoning why HTML is not
'okay' in email or news.
Well, i am not allowed to post in HTML to most of my newsservers.
Hartmut
'not allowed'? By whom?
Thunderbird defaults to 'all newservers' are plain text
Keith Whaley wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Why is HTML 'okay' in RSS but not in email or news? I view
everything in HTML (always have) and have no problems.
Because RSS feeds generally point to web pages, and mail or news
accounts point
David Wilkinson wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
I have used Netscape/Mozilla Suite/SeaMonkey for many years, and for
mail and newsgroups I always both display and compose messages in
plain text. I absolutely refuse to have anything to do with HTML in
mail or newsgroups.
However, in SeaMonkey
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan):
Why is HTML 'okay' in RSS but not in email or news? I view everything in
HTML (always have) and have no problems.
Do you see then the exactly under the 'okay'? ;)
Hartmut
No, its offset slightly when I read the message
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Hartmut Figge:
Moz Champion (Dan):
Why is HTML 'okay' in RSS but not in email or news? I view everything in
HTML (always have) and have no problems.
Do you see
David Wilkinson wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Why is HTML 'okay' in RSS but not in email or news? I view everything
in HTML (always have) and have no problems.
Because RSS feeds generally point to web pages, and mail or news
accounts point to messages.
So? Still does not explain
HeavyDuty wrote:
For many years Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo has been a constant
mainstay and very helpful, if sometimes cranky, contributor to this news
group.
Since April 29, he has not been part of the fray, as far as I can tell.
Is he OK...Peter, are you OK?
He posted yesterday in
flyguy wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16)
on what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz
system running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
flyguy wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16)
on what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz
system running Vista
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM.. SeaMonkey mail
performance, especially
Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM.. SeaMonkey mail performance,
especially anything moving messages between folders, is really
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
Leonidas Jones schrieb:
zvnteq7 wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
zvnteq7 wrote:
zvnteq7 wrote:
zvnteq7 wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
zvnteq7 wrote:
I noticed that moving between newsgroup
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads.
I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated.
Post as you wish.
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
That's nothing.
I am running over 8GB and have all my mails since 1998
Keith Whaley wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
keith_w wrote:
I have rarely been able to forward a message I received to someone
else, exactly as I received it.
In other words, as I have experienced it, if all I was forwarding was
a full text message, with no embedded graphics or other non
keith_w wrote:
I have rarely been able to forward a message I received to someone else,
exactly as I received it.
In other words, as I have experienced it, if all I was forwarding was a
full text message, with no embedded graphics or other non-ascii items,
the message was forwarded without
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Yes - putting stuff in every message that forces the converter to say
send in HTML is a common workaround that a lot of people do (see the
original thread I referenced at the top of this one). Having a fancy
HTML signature also works as a workaround.
In fact, it looks
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
I wish Mozilla did allow me a choice. No matter how hard I try to
have messages go, by default, in HTML. Mozilla looks at them and says
yeah, plain text is good enough and converts them.
that's the problem.
All I'm suggesting is an OPTION to disable the
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was
trying to be space efficient.
not everyone is viewing this group on
Daniel wrote:
jim wrote:
Troubles trying to Access Annexcafe Jim
Jim, as I posted to you in your other thread, if you want to post a
screen shot of the message you are getting for your problem, the group
mozilla.support.screenshots has been set up on this server just for that
purpose!
HeavyDuty wrote:
SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3
Just curious,
I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of
sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the smtp
server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found.
Since I was replying to a known sender, I
HeavyDuty wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
HeavyDuty wrote:
SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3
Just curious,
I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of
sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the
smtp server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 03/22/09 06:50, Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
text
html
Html AND text = when this option for email is used,
does the text get doubled up? I often receive email
that suggests this is the case.
In short, yes.
When you send in plain text, the message
Rick Merrill wrote:
text
html
Html AND text = when this option for email is used,
does the text get doubled up? I often receive email
that suggests this is the case.
In short, yes.
When you send in plain text, the message is sent in plain text of
course. When you send in html, the message
Ant wrote:
On 3/16/2009 12:44 PM PT, Bill Davidsen typed:
No, SM1.1.x will only receive security-updates.
SM2.0 is the the one which gets all the new features.
I would consider a bug allowing a malicious (or mangled) web page to
freeze the browser to be a security issue...
Good point
Keith Whaley wrote:
Phillip Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Before anyone starts.
I am asking a question. I've quit giving support for Mac SeaMonkey.
Sorry to hear that, Phillip.
Because I've told one too many time to shove it, Mac support is
unwelcome nor desired.
By whom? No, seriously! What
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 2/23/09 4:29 PM, _Rostyslaw Lewyckyj_ spoke thusly:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
O.k. Let me pose the problem in a different way :-)
How does the action and result of news://server/newsgroup?list-ids
differ
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 02/08/2009 12:34 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
However connected to the server newsgroups.bellsouth.net,
when I tried to cross post my article, I received the error
message that I can not post an article to two servers!
I had to post
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Don Miller wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Don Miller wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Don Miller wrote:
I have a newsgroup where some of the forums will still show that
the message has not been read or set with Ctrl/Shft/C
Don Miller wrote:
I have a newsgroup where some of the forums will still show that
the message has not been read or set with Ctrl/Shft/C no matter
how many times I click on it. I have even removed the newsgroup
and went into the Mozilla folder and removed anything to do
with it and and re-added
Don Miller wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Don Miller wrote:
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Don Miller wrote:
I have a newsgroup where some of the forums will still show that
the message has not been read or set with Ctrl/Shft/C no matter
TIA
Don
What newsgroups?
The newsgroup
NoOp wrote:
On 12/17/2008 06:26 PM, Norman Fuchs wrote:
Since I installed 1.1.14 (I had 1.1.13 previously), all my messages
(Mail and Newsgroup messages) have a bold red question mark in the Junk
status column. (Well, all but the ones in the Inbox mail folder.) The
question marks do not
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray K wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Just drops dead on http://cagle.com/news/BLOG trying to look at his
latest cartoon for the French.
Week-old SM 2.0a3 was able to open the same page just fine.
Tested under Fedora FC9 and FC10, using the version from
33 matches
Mail list logo
