Re: Demise of Sync - alternatives?

rather than next > year or not at all)? > > Thomas Rocek recently posted the instructions for setting up a new Sync 1.1 > server, but they're way beyond my tech abilities. Is anyone aware of a > publicly available Sync 1.1 method that Seamonkey users could rely on for th

Re: Demise of Sync - alternatives?

rather than next > year or not at all)? > > Thomas Rocek recently posted the instructions for setting up a new Sync 1.1 > server, but they're way beyond my tech abilities. Is anyone aware of a > publicly available Sync 1.1 method that Seamonkey users could rely on for the >

Re: sync not working the last few days?

On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 5:51:14 AM UTC-4, Herrmann Hofer wrote: > Thomas Rocek wrote: > > I've seen earlier discussion of the possibility of closing down the sync > > server and/or transitioning to the sync used for Firefox; I hope we would > > get some warning if th

Re: sync not working the last few days?

On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 9:17:39 AM UTC-4, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: > El 03/10/15 a las 13:42, Thomas Rocek escribió: > > On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 5:51:14 AM UTC-4, Herrmann Hofer > > wrote: > >> > >> 1443865390221 Sync.ErrorHand

sync not working the last few days?

I have a bunch of machines running Seamonkey (2.38, but sync was set up long before the "can't link new machine" problem). I'm not sure when it started, but at least as of yesterday I'm getting "Sync encountered an error while syncing: Unknown error" message; if I go to preferences-->sync to

Re: sync not working the last few days?

On Friday, October 2, 2015 at 1:08:03 PM UTC-4, Bill Spikowski wrote: > Thomas Rocek wrote: > > I have a bunch of machines running Seamonkey (2.38, but sync was set up > > long before the "can't link new machine" problem). > > > > I'm not sure when it star

Re: SMTP parameter in SM2 after having migrated from SM1

rocek wrote: Daniel wrote: Daniel wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: rocek schrieb: I am experiencing similar problems, and went so far as to ask our systems people at the University of Delaware to check it out; they downloaded Seamonkey 2.0 and couldn't get it to work with our servers with any

Re: SMTP parameter in SM2 after having migrated from SM1

Daniel wrote: Daniel wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: rocek schrieb: I am experiencing similar problems, and went so far as to ask our systems people at the University of Delaware to check it out; they downloaded Seamonkey 2.0 and couldn't get it to work with our servers with any combination

Re: SMTP parameter in SM2 after having migrated from SM1

jim wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:49:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: jim wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:09:40 +0100, obones obones_g...@fds_free.fr in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: Hello all, I'm currently reviewing SM2 and when I installed it