Re: [Bug 754622] Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-13 Thread NoOp
On 05/13/2012 12:35 PM, Jim Taylor wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> >> This thread, and the bug report stated that: 1) the bug is linux only >> ("Windows SM 2.9.1 versions + Java 7_4: WinXP& Win7& all work fine.", >> and 2) Platform: x86 Linux. But thanks for checking anyway :-) > > > Sorry I missed

Re: [Bug 754622] Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Taylor
NoOp wrote: Snip. I have added comment 2 to the bug to show that jave 7_04 does work with SeaMonkey 2.9.1 on Windows so it's not a universal problem across all platforms. Jim This thread, and the bug report stated that: 1) the bug is linux only ("Windows SM 2.9.1 versions + Java 7_4: Wi

Re: [Bug 754622] Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-13 Thread NoOp
On 05/13/2012 06:30 AM, Jim Taylor wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 05/12/2012 10:55 AM, NoOp wrote: >> ... >>> Given that it does work with SeaMonkey in Windows (XP and 7), I suspect >>> that the linux builds may still have a paramater that blocklists Java 7. >>> Maybe related to the older Mozilla block

Re: [Bug 754622] Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Taylor
NoOp wrote: On 05/12/2012 10:55 AM, NoOp wrote: ... Given that it does work with SeaMonkey in Windows (XP and 7), I suspect that the linux builds may still have a paramater that blocklists Java 7. Maybe related to the older Mozilla blocklist?

[Bug 754622] Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-12 Thread NoOp
On 05/12/2012 10:55 AM, NoOp wrote: ... > Given that it does work with SeaMonkey in Windows (XP and 7), I suspect > that the linux builds may still have a paramater that blocklists Java 7. > Maybe related to the older Mozilla blocklist? > > "Wh