Re: [Resolved] Re: Flash (Linux) again...

2013-12-10 Thread »Q«
In , rotter...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, November 30, 2013 7:35:38 AM UTC+1, NoOp wrote: > > On 11/23/2013 11:19 AM, Geoff Welsh wrote: > > > > > NoOp wrote: > > > > ... > > > > >> Found the problem& filed a bug report: > > > >

Re: [Resolved] Re: Flash (Linux) again...

2013-12-10 Thread rotterdxm
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 7:35:38 AM UTC+1, NoOp wrote: > On 11/23/2013 11:19 AM, Geoff Welsh wrote: > > > NoOp wrote: > > ... > > >> Found the problem& filed a bug report: > > >> > > >> > > >> Both Firefox and Seamonkey put incorrec

Re: [Resolved] Re: Flash (Linux) again...

2013-11-29 Thread NoOp
On 11/23/2013 11:19 AM, Geoff Welsh wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> Found the problem& filed a bug report: >> >> >> Both Firefox and Seamonkey put incorrect plugin information in the >> pluginreg.dat file. Note that the version information in both

Re: [Resolved] Re: Flash (Linux) again...

2013-11-23 Thread goodwin
On 11/22/2013 03:42 PM, NoOp wrote: and the plugin check works correctly. thats an oops for sure... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

[Resolved] Re: Flash (Linux) again...

2013-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2013 03:06 PM, NoOp wrote: > Web site(s) are reporting that I do not have Flash installed. I do have > the most current linux version installed: > > SeaMonkey 2.2.0/1: > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 > SeaMonkey/2.22 > Shockwave Flash > File: lib