Re: [iTunes loss] was (Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK )

NoOp wrote: On 12/09/2009 08:54 AM, NoOp wrote: On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote: NoOp wrote: ... So "John" are you the same "Rick" from that thread? pawall...@gmail.com My guess is you are. no Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it might be a good idea t

Re: [iTunes loss] was (Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK )

NoOp wrote: On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote: NoOp wrote: ... So "John" are you the same "Rick" from that thread? pawall...@gmail.com My guess is you are. no Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it might be a good idea to start a new thread (perhaps: SM2.0

Re: [iTunes loss] was (Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK )

On 12/09/2009 08:54 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote: >> NoOp wrote: > ... >>> >>> So "John" are you the same "Rick" from that thread? >>> pawall...@gmail.com >>> My guess is you are. >>> >>> >>> >> no > > Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps i

[iTunes loss] was (Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK )

On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> >> So "John" are you the same "Rick" from that thread? >> pawall...@gmail.com >> My guess is you are. >> >> >> > no Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it might be a good idea to start a new thread (perhaps