Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-09-12 Thread NoOp
On 08/30/2012 04:34 PM, David H. Durgee wrote: > Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >>> Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that >>> 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? >>> >>> Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey >>>

Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-08-31 Thread Philip TAYLOR
NoOp wrote: Start your own thread if you want to ask about Windows. Give order to those who report to you, not to your peers. Philip Taylor ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/su

Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-08-30 Thread NoOp
On 08/30/2012 02:34 PM, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > > On 08/29/2012 10:02 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > >>> Unfortunately, not by us for 2.12. Getting updates generated/generating >>> for linux64 is on our TODO list, however. > > What about a native 64-bit implementation for Microsoft Windpows

Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-08-30 Thread David H. Durgee
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: NoOp wrote: Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey Unfortunately, not by us for 2.12. Getting updates generated/gene

Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-08-30 Thread Philip TAYLOR
On 08/29/2012 10:02 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Unfortunately, not by us for 2.12. Getting updates generated/generating for linux64 is on our TODO list, however. What about a native 64-bit implementation for Microsoft Windpows ? Philip Taylor

Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-08-30 Thread NoOp
On 08/29/2012 10:02 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that >> 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? >> >> Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey >> > > Unfortunately, not by us

Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-08-29 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
NoOp wrote: > Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that > 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? > > Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey > Unfortunately, not by us for 2.12. Getting updates generated/generating for linux64 is

[linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?

2012-08-29 Thread NoOp
Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.