Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-05 Thread GerardJan
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Steve Dunn wrote: On 2019-05-04 13:39, David E. Ross wrote: SeaMonkey does not require extensions to be signed, at least in the current end-user release 2.49.4.  Which is largely a moot point since there have been few if any updates to most of these exten

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-05 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son
Steve Dunn wrote: On 2019-05-04 13:39, David E. Ross wrote: SeaMonkey does not require extensions to be signed, at least in the current end-user release 2.49.4. Which is largely a moot point since there have been few if any updates to most of these extensions for SeaMonkey's obsolete e

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-05 Thread GerardJan
Ant wrote: On 5/4/2019 10:17 AM, EE wrote: Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Here is something I saw reported a few minutes ago: https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/03/a-glitch-is-breaking-all-firefox-extensions/ (it wanted me to confirm cookies so I opened it in Private Mode). Speaking strictly for

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-04 Thread Ant via support-seamonkey
On 5/4/2019 3:27 PM, Steve Dunn wrote: On 2019-05-04 13:39, David E. Ross wrote: SeaMonkey does not require extensions to be signed, at least in the current end-user release 2.49.4. Which is largely a moot point since there have been few if any updates to most of these extensions for S

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-04 Thread Ant via support-seamonkey
On 5/4/2019 10:17 AM, EE wrote: Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Here is something I saw reported a few minutes ago: https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/03/a-glitch-is-breaking-all-firefox-extensions/ (it wanted me to confirm cookies so I opened it in Private Mode). Speaking strictly for myself, I hav

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-04 Thread Steve Dunn
On 2019-05-04 13:39, David E. Ross wrote: SeaMonkey does not require extensions to be signed, at least in the current end-user release 2.49.4. Which is largely a moot point since there have been few if any updates to most of these extensions for SeaMonkey's obsolete extension system for th

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-04 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/4/2019 4:25 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: > Here is something I saw reported a few minutes ago: > https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/03/a-glitch-is-breaking-all-firefox-extensions/ > > (it wanted me to confirm cookies so I opened it in Private Mode). > Speaking strictly for myself, I have

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-04 Thread EE
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Here is something I saw reported a few minutes ago: https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/03/a-glitch-is-breaking-all-firefox-extensions/ (it wanted me to confirm cookies so I opened it in Private Mode). Speaking strictly for myself, I have two extensions installed under

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-04 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Here is something I saw reported a few minutes ago: https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/03/a-glitch-is-breaking-all-firefox-extensions/ (it wanted me to confirm cookies so I opened it in Private Mode). Speaking strictly for myself, I have two extensions installed under

All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

2019-05-04 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son
Here is something I saw reported a few minutes ago: https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/03/a-glitch-is-breaking-all-firefox-extensions/ (it wanted me to confirm cookies so I opened it in Private Mode). Speaking strictly for myself, I have two extensions installed under Seamonkey: - Privacy Badger (a