Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-15 Thread Paul
Lee wrote: On 9/15/11, Paul wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: Provocative enough subject line? Actually I'm *serious* ! I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying to protect users from there own culpable acts. I take responsibility for my own well being by: 1. *DISABLING*

Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-15 Thread Lee
On 9/15/11, Paul wrote: > Richard Owlett wrote: >> Provocative enough subject line? >> Actually I'm *serious* ! >> >> I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying to >> protect users from there own culpable acts. >> >> I take responsibility for my own well being by: >> 1. *D

OT Merc anticts (was:- Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???)

2011-09-15 Thread Daniel
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 15/09/2011 00:12, NoOp told the world: got behind the wheel on his Mercedes at twice the speed limit -- Difficult enough to do at the speed limit!! -- Daniel _

Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-14 Thread Paul
Richard Owlett wrote: Provocative enough subject line? Actually I'm *serious* ! I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying to protect users from there own culpable acts. I take responsibility for my own well being by: 1. *DISABLING* {user.js *IS* your friend} Java

Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-14 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 15/09/2011 00:12, NoOp told the world: > Well, let's not forget that it also affected Mozilla addons... > > > DigiNotar's omissions came as a personal affront to Mozilla, since one > of the domain

Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-14 Thread NoOp
On 09/14/2011 07:51 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > On 15/09/11 03:27, Richard Owlett wrote: >> Provocative enough subject line? >> Actually I'm *serious* ! >> >> I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying to >> protect users from there own culpable acts. >> >> I take responsib

Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-14 Thread Tony Mechelynck
On 15/09/11 03:27, Richard Owlett wrote: Provocative enough subject line? Actually I'm *serious* ! I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying to protect users from there own culpable acts. I take responsibility for my own well being by: 1. *DISABLING* {user.js *IS* your

Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-14 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 14/09/2011 22:27, Richard Owlett told the world: > Provocative enough subject line? > Actually I'm *serious* ! > > I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying > to protect users from there own culpable acts. > > I take responsibility for my own well b

Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-14 Thread Richard Owlett
Provocative enough subject line? Actually I'm *serious* ! I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying to protect users from there own culpable acts. I take responsibility for my own well being by: 1. *DISABLING* {user.js *IS* your friend} JavaScript Cookies 2.