Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
rick-shar wrote:
...don't suppose you have any insights for the first one I described,
with [x] references called out in the html code?
I don't really understand what your problem is with the first one.
It's quite a
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
rick-shar wrote:
...don't suppose you have any insights for the first one I described,
with [x] references called out in the html code?
I don't really understand what your problem is with the first one. It's
quite a common convention in
rick-shar wrote:
...don't suppose you have any insights for the
first one I described, with [x] references called out in the html code?
I don't really understand what your problem is with the first one. It's
quite a common convention in plain-text emails where, unlike HTML, there
is no
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Messages arrive as HTML. In the message preview window of SM, with
the message displayed, I see a sentence, with 2 words underlined,
and hovering over that changes the cursor as expected for a
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
In this case, it seems clear that the sender is to blame. They're
using footnotes and putting the URLs in the notes, not hyperlinking
them in the body text.
OK Paul, can you decipher the other one I had this with?
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Messages arrive as HTML. In the message preview window of SM, with
the message displayed, I see a sentence, with 2 words underlined, and
hovering over that changes the cursor as expected for a hyperlink.
But clicking does nothing, and I do not
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
In this case, it seems clear that the sender is to blame. They're
using footnotes and putting the URLs in the notes, not hyperlinking
them in the body text.
OK Paul, can you decipher the other one I had this with? Here's the
beginning of the
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Are you saying that SeaMonkey is not recognizing and activating URLs
in plain-text messages, or that your senders are formatting URLs as
plain text in HTML messages?
For example, if I write http://www.example.com,
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Are you saying that SeaMonkey is not recognizing and activating URLs
in plain-text messages, or that your senders are formatting URLs as
plain text in HTML messages?
For example, if I write http://www.example.com, does it remain plain
text,
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Win10 Pro workgroup PC.
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4---Build identifier:
20180713174829
Have recently noticed that hyperlinks in received messages don't show
URL info at
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Win10 Pro workgroup PC.
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4---Build identifier: 20180713174829
Have recently noticed that hyperlinks in received messages don't show
URL info at the bottom of the current
Win10 Pro workgroup PC.
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4---Build identifier: 20180713174829
Have recently noticed that hyperlinks in received messages don't show
URL info at the bottom of the current window, and also don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
