Re: SM2.2 Add-ons Manager searches poorly

2011-07-17 Thread Chris Ilias
On 11-07-17 1:14 PM, JohnQPublic wrote: "Chris Ilias" wrote in message news:q_ednwzxwbanelztnz2dnuvz_hmdn...@mozilla.org... I think it is more about the version of Flashblock on AMO being Firefox-only. For instance, if you go to y

Re: SM2.2 Add-ons Manager searches poorly

2011-07-17 Thread JohnQPublic
"Chris Ilias" wrote in message news:q_ednwzxwbanelztnz2dnuvz_hmdn...@mozilla.org... > On 11-07-15 11:30 PM, JohnQPublic wrote: >> I use the Flashblock add-on in Firefox which comes up OK when I search >> for >> "Flashblock" with the Firefox Add-ons Manager, along with 23 other >> related >> add-on

Re: SM2.2 Add-ons Manager searches poorly

2011-07-16 Thread Chris Ilias
On 11-07-15 11:30 PM, JohnQPublic wrote: I use the Flashblock add-on in Firefox which comes up OK when I search for "Flashblock" with the Firefox Add-ons Manager, along with 23 other related add-ons. When I try the same search in SeaMonkey2.2, only one add-on is found, NoScript, which is related

Re: SM2.2 Add-ons Manager searches poorly

2011-07-15 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 16/07/2011 00:30, JohnQPublic told the world: > I use the Flashblock add-on in Firefox which comes up OK when I search for > "Flashblock" with the Firefox Add-ons Manager, along with 23 other related > add-ons. When I try the same search in SeaMonkey2.2, only one add-on is > f

SM2.2 Add-ons Manager searches poorly

2011-07-15 Thread JohnQPublic
I use the Flashblock add-on in Firefox which comes up OK when I search for "Flashblock" with the Firefox Add-ons Manager, along with 23 other related add-ons. When I try the same search in SeaMonkey2.2, only one add-on is found, NoScript, which is related but not what I want. I had to do a google s