Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-24 Thread Chris Ilias
On 12-08-24 2:22 PM, rjkrjk wrote: you're missing the point the Intel message is cosmetic usage of the site is OK - once to click anything, the message disappears so much for warnings ! btw, how many times does one need to go to Intel.com ?? Let's not forget that this is a support newsgroup,

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-24 Thread Ed Mullen
rjkrjk wrote: you're missing the point the Intel message is cosmetic usage of the site is OK - once to click anything, the message disappears so much for warnings ! btw, how many times does one need to go to Intel.com ?? sean nathan wrote, On 8/24/2012 12:55 AM: rjkrjk wrote: why is there

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-24 Thread rjkrjk
you're missing the point the Intel message is cosmetic usage of the site is OK - once to click anything, the message disappears so much for warnings ! btw, how many times does one need to go to Intel.com ?? sean nathan wrote, On 8/24/2012 12:55 AM: rjkrjk wrote: why is there so much concern

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-24 Thread Daniel
sean nathan wrote: rjkrjk wrote: why is there so much concern over 1 website that obviously wants you to use a MS product rather one that that is much better "much to do about nothing" you are free to unsubscribe... or at the very least not posts in threads you think are much ado... sean

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread Philip TAYLOR
rjkrjk wrote: why is there so much concern over 1 website that obviously wants you to use a MS product rather one that that is much better 1) There is no evidence that Intel is trying to push visitors towards IE 2) The site is Intel.com; given that Intel make more than 70% of the CPUs in

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread sean nathan
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Daniel wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: Visiting the Intel corporate web site today at : while seeking support for Intel Active Management Technology, I received the followi

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread sean nathan
rjkrjk wrote: why is there so much concern over 1 website that obviously wants you to use a MS product rather one that that is much better "much to do about nothing" you are free to unsubscribe... or at the very least not posts in threads you think are much ado... sean -- you can't alway

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread Rufus
NoOp wrote: On 08/23/2012 12:24 PM, sean nathan wrote: WLS wrote: On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found nothing on s

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread rjkrjk
why is there so much concern over 1 website that obviously wants you to use a MS product rather one that that is much better "much to do about nothing" = sean nathan wrote, On 8/23/2012 3:05 PM: Philip TAYLOR wrote: Daniel wrote: I thought the Firefox bit in Build

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread NoOp
On 08/23/2012 12:24 PM, sean nathan wrote: > WLS wrote: >> On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: >>> On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: >> >> >> >>> Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found not

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread sean nathan
WLS wrote: On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found nothing on searching browser id. A pointer where its at would help?

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread sean nathan
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 18/08/2012 09:21, Philip TAYLOR told the world: Ed wrote: > I forgot to say that the above is rating the program NOT the amount of users. > Sorry for the omission. Ah, fairly significant difference. Unless we can show that, across the whole spectrum

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-23 Thread sean nathan
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Daniel wrote: I thought the Firefox bit in Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 was supposed to protect us from this! That is my build id, so checked Philip's User Agent:- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows N

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-20 Thread Russ Fineman
WLS wrote: > On 08/19/2012 08:47 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: >> WLS wrote: >>> On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: >>> >>> >>> > Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found > no parameter with the browser ID. Also

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-19 Thread Paul
Russ Fineman wrote: Paul wrote: Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found nothing on searching browser id. A pointer where its at would help? Thanks IMO, most people install an add on like User Agent Sw

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-19 Thread WLS
On 08/19/2012 08:47 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: > WLS wrote: >> On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: >>> On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: >> >> >> >>> Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found no

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-19 Thread Russ Fineman
WLS wrote: > On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: >> On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: > > > >> >>> Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found >>> no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found nothing on >>> searching browser id. >>> >>> A pointer

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-19 Thread WLS
On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: > On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: > >> Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found >> no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found nothing on >> searching browser id. >> >> A pointer where its at would help?

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-19 Thread JD
Russ Fineman wrote: Paul wrote: MCBastos wrote: (snip) I think we are being victims of ourselves here: the new, compatibility-friendly user-agent string is making our share in browser usage stats be assigned to Firefox. I bet you are correct. I did not have any problems with the Intel website

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-19 Thread WLS
On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: > Paul wrote: >> MCBastos wrote: >> (snip) >>> I think we are being victims of ourselves here: the new, >>> compatibility-friendly user-agent string is making our share in browser >>> usage stats be assigned to Firefox. >> >> I bet you are correct. >> I d

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-19 Thread Russ Fineman
Paul wrote: > MCBastos wrote: > (snip) >> I think we are being victims of ourselves here: the new, >> compatibility-friendly user-agent string is making our share in browser >> usage stats be assigned to Firefox. > > I bet you are correct. > I did not have any problems with the Intel website, > mo

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:17:16 +0100 Philip TAYLOR wrote: > Visiting the Intel corporate web site today at : > > > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/privacy/intel-online-privacy-notice-summary.html > > while seeking support for Intel Active Management Technology, > I received the foll

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Paul
MCBastos wrote: (snip) I think we are being victims of ourselves here: the new, compatibility-friendly user-agent string is making our share in browser usage stats be assigned to Firefox. I bet you are correct. I did not have any problems with the Intel website, most likely due to my spoofing:

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Ant
It's not just Intel. A lot of companies/web sites. :( On 8/18/2012 1:17 AM PT, Philip TAYLOR typed: Visiting the Intel corporate web site today at : http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/privacy/intel-online-privacy-notice-summary.html while seeking support for Intel Active Management

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread WLS
Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > > WLS wrote: > >> Interesting. Nothing with ${AppBuildID}? Then I don't know where that >> preference came from. > > Nothing matching "buildid" at all. >> >> Try this (backup profile first); >> >> set general.useragent.override to Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) >

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
WLS wrote: Interesting. Nothing with ${AppBuildID}? Then I don't know where that preference came from. Nothing matching "buildid" at all. Try this (backup profile first); set general.useragent.override to Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Philip Chee wrote: According to the rules hammered out, one browser per organization/company. Although a community project, SeaMonkey nevertheless exists under the Mozilla umbrella. Robert Kaiser wrote : With the increase of the Mozilla portfolio to include more products, volunteer-only loo

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread WLS
Philip TAYLOR wrote: WLS wrote: FWIW, I went into about:config and removed ${AppBuildID} from the nightly.templates.buildid preference, and didn't get that message afterwards. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 No such option in my "about:

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Rick Merrill
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 18/08/2012 09:21, Philip TAYLOR told the world: Ed wrote: > I forgot to say that the above is rating the program NOT the amount of users. > Sorry for the omission. Ah, fairly significant difference. Unless we can show that, across the whole spectrum

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 18/08/2012 09:21, Philip TAYLOR told the world: > > > Ed wrote: > > I forgot to say that the above is rating the program NOT the amount > of users. > > Sorry for the omission. > > Ah, fairly significant difference. Unless we can show that, across the > whole spectrum o

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip Chee
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:14:00 +0100, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > > Ed wrote: > > > > According to http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/ > > SeaMonkey is # 8 > > Then it is surely time for the Seamonkey council to tweak the dragon's > tail, and if their representations are not adequat

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
WLS wrote: FWIW, I went into about:config and removed ${AppBuildID} from the nightly.templates.buildid preference, and didn't get that message afterwards. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 No such option in my "about:config" (not surprisin

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread WLS
On 08/18/2012 04:17 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > Visiting the Intel corporate web site today at : > > > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/privacy/intel-online-privacy-notice-summary.html > > > while seeking support for Intel Active Management Technology, > I received the following warnin

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Ed wrote: > I forgot to say that the above is rating the program NOT the amount of users. > Sorry for the omission. Ah, fairly significant difference. Unless we can show that, across the whole spectrum of Windows-compliant browsers, we are in the top 12, then there will be no basis on whic

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Ed
On 8/18/2012 8:07 AM Ed submitted the following: > On 8/18/2012 7:02 AM Philip TAYLOR submitted the following: >> >> >> Ed wrote: >> >>> I also see the same result. SeaMonkey is not one of those listed. I >>> filled out >>> their contact form and asked why they didn't recognize SeaMonkey or othe

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Ed wrote: > > According to http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/ > SeaMonkey is # 8 Then it is surely time for the Seamonkey council to tweak the dragon's tail, and if their representations are not adequately addressed, to take the matter to the European Court of Justice. I wonde

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Ed
On 8/18/2012 7:02 AM Philip TAYLOR submitted the following: > > > Ed wrote: > >> I also see the same result. SeaMonkey is not one of those listed. I filled >> out >> their contact form and asked why they didn't recognize SeaMonkey or other >> popular browsers. Wonder if I'll get an answer. >

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Daniel wrote: > Philip TAYLOR wrote: >> Visiting the Intel corporate web site today at : >> >> >> >> while seeking support for Intel Active Management Technology, I >> received the following warning : >> >>>

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Ed wrote: I also see the same result. SeaMonkey is not one of those listed. I filled out their contact form and asked why they didn't recognize SeaMonkey or other popular browsers. Wonder if I'll get an answer. Thank you, Ed. Perhaps of even greater concern is that Seamonkey is not liste

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Daniel
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Daniel wrote: I thought the Firefox bit in Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 was supposed to protect us from this! That is my build id, so checked Philip's User Agent:- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows N

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Ed
On 8/18/2012 5:54 AM Philip TAYLOR submitted the following: > > > Daniel wrote: > >> I thought the Firefox bit in >> >> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) >> Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 >> >> was supposed to protect us from this! That is my build

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Daniel wrote: I thought the Firefox bit in Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 was supposed to protect us from this! That is my build id, so checked Philip's User Agent:- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/

Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Daniel
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Visiting the Intel corporate web site today at : http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/privacy/intel-online-privacy-notice-summary.html while seeking support for Intel Active Management Technology, I received the following warning : The browser version you are usin

Seamonkey not liked by Intel

2012-08-18 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Visiting the Intel corporate web site today at : http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/privacy/intel-online-privacy-notice-summary.html while seeking support for Intel Active Management Technology, I received the following warning : The browser version you are using is not recommende