Re: Tbird vs SM

2016-04-14 Thread Felix Miata
Philip Chee composed on 2016-04-14 20:52 (UTC+0800): Ed Mullen wrote: I know SM is derived from Firefox and Thunderbird. Actually all three are descended from the old Mozilla Suite (a.k.a. Netscape Communicator v6). I don't agree entirely with that description. For those who weren't

Re: Tbird vs SM

2016-04-14 Thread Philip Chee
On 09/04/2016 09:34, Ed Mullen wrote: > I know SM is derived from Firefox and Thunderbird. Actually all three are descended from the old Mozilla Suite (a.k.a. Netscape Communicator v6). SeaMonkey is a direct descendant in terms of continuity. Phil -- Philip Chee ,

Re: Tbird vs SM

2016-04-09 Thread Ed Mullen
On 4/8/2016 11:12 PM, WaltS48's fingers rattled off: On 04/08/2016 09:34 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: I know SM is derived from Firefox and Thunderbird. I just fired up TB for yucks and it was a mess. Please explain. I can't because I uninstalled it. Only had it for testing anyway. Maybe only

Re: Tbird vs SM

2016-04-08 Thread WaltS48
On 04/08/2016 09:34 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: I know SM is derived from Firefox and Thunderbird. I just fired up TB for yucks and it was a mess. Please explain. -- Linux Mint 17.3 Go Pens! Go Bucs! Visit Pittsburgh Coexist ยท Understanding Across Divides

Re: Tbird vs SM

2016-04-08 Thread Ray Davison
David E. Ross wrote: While I use SeaMonkey as my browser, I prefer to use Thunderbird as my E-mail, newsgroup, and news feed (RSS) application. That is because I frequently switch browsing profiles. I do not want to lose my current E-mail, newsgroup, and RSS session with each profile switch.

Re: Tbird vs SM

2016-04-08 Thread Roger Fink
Original Message I know SM is derived from Firefox and Thunderbird. I just fired up TB for yucks and it was a mess. Firefox is less of a mess. But, kudos to the SeaMonkey team for, apparently, taking the good stuff from FF and TB and putting into SM without screwing up

Re: Tbird vs SM

2016-04-08 Thread David E. Ross
On 4/8/2016 6:34 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: > I know SM is derived from Firefox and Thunderbird. > > I just fired up TB for yucks and it was a mess. > > Firefox is less of a mess. > > But, kudos to the SeaMonkey team for, apparently, taking the good stuff > from FF and TB and putting into SM without

Tbird vs SM

2016-04-08 Thread Ed Mullen
I know SM is derived from Firefox and Thunderbird. I just fired up TB for yucks and it was a mess. Firefox is less of a mess. But, kudos to the SeaMonkey team for, apparently, taking the good stuff from FF and TB and putting into SM without screwing up SeaMonkey. Many thanks!!! Keep the