The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-19 Thread Graham
I've been reading the posts from people who have been quite adamant, even rude, about SeaMonkey 2's deficiencies. I held off from installing 2.0.0, and waited from 2.0.1. I thought there were bound to be some problems, but how could it be all that bad? It's that bad. First there's the need to

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Martin Freitag
Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the developers not use master

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the de

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Graham wrote: I've been reading the posts from people who have been quite adamant, even rude, about SeaMonkey 2's deficiencies. I held off from installing 2.0.0, and waited from 2.0.1. I thought there were bound to be some problems, but how could it be all that bad? It's that bad. First ther

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the developm

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip throug

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth c

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at leng

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread NoOp
On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote: ... > > When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend) > on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the > Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup > because you haven't done anythin

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
NoOp wrote: On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote: ... When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend) on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup because you haven't done anyth

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Graham
Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the developers not use master passwords? If it o

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Martin Freitag
Graham schrieb: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the developers not use master pas

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Phillip Jones
Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the develo

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Graham
Martin Freitag wrote: If you fetch mail in start, wouldn't it be required then? It's possible that you have to disable that functionality in the preferences to get rid of an initial asking for the Master-PW. I'm not using it for mail, and it isn't checking anything at startup. Or at least, al