I've been reading the posts from people who have been quite adamant,
even rude, about SeaMonkey 2's deficiencies. I held off from installing
2.0.0, and waited from 2.0.1. I thought there were bound to be some
problems, but how could it be all that bad?
It's that bad.
First there's the need to
Graham schrieb:
It's that bad.
No, not THAT bad. ;-P
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something like that slip through the development process? Do the
developers not use master
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
It's that bad.
No, not THAT bad. ;-P
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something like that slip through the development process? Do the
de
Graham wrote:
I've been reading the posts from people who have been quite adamant,
even rude, about SeaMonkey 2's deficiencies. I held off from installing
2.0.0, and waited from 2.0.1. I thought there were bound to be some
problems, but how could it be all that bad?
It's that bad.
First ther
Phillip Jones wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
It's that bad.
No, not THAT bad. ;-P
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something like that slip through the developm
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
It's that bad.
No, not THAT bad. ;-P
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something like that slip throug
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
It's that bad.
No, not THAT bad. ;-P
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
It's that bad.
No, not THAT bad. ;-P
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
c
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
It's that bad.
No, not THAT bad. ;-P
First there's the need to provide your master password when you
start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at leng
On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote:
...
>
> When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend)
> on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the
> Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup
> because you haven't done anythin
NoOp wrote:
On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote:
...
When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend)
on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the
Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup
because you haven't done anyth
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something like that slip through the development process? Do the
developers not use master passwords?
If it o
Graham schrieb:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something like that slip through the development process? Do the
developers not use master pas
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Graham schrieb:
First there's the need to provide your master password when you start
it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth
could something like that slip through the development process? Do the
develo
Martin Freitag wrote:
If you fetch mail in start, wouldn't it be required then?
It's possible that you have to disable that functionality in the
preferences to get rid of an initial asking for the Master-PW.
I'm not using it for mail, and it isn't checking anything at startup. Or
at least, al
15 matches
Mail list logo