On 5 nov, 00:56, dominique doume...@netscape.net wrote:
OldCroc escribió:
Con todos los problemas que los usuarios experimentados de más, de
SeaMonkey, son
Tener, es posible que el Final lanzamiento de la versión 2.0 fue
Prematuramente en libertad?? Sí, hay muchos usuarios satisfechos,
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
snip
Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a
fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better.
Personaly if the SM 2 Bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601
is not
OldCroc wrote:
With all the problems that too many seasoned users, of SeaMonkey,are
having, is it possible that the Final release of version 2.0 was
released PREMATURELY?? Yes, there are many satisfied users, also, but
there ARE too many who are NOT and the attitude of the developers
should be
Ray_Net wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
snip
Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a
fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better.
Personaly if the SM 2 Bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601
is not solved SM2 is *not*
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
snip
Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is
a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better.
Personaly if the SM 2 Bug
Lance Courtland wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
snip
Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is
a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better.
Personaly if the SM 2 Bug
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
snip
Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is
a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better.
Personaly if the SM 2 Bug
7 matches
Mail list logo