Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

2009-11-07 Thread intrudere
On 5 nov, 00:56, dominique doume...@netscape.net wrote: OldCroc escribió: Con todos los problemas que los usuarios experimentados de más, de SeaMonkey, son Tener, es posible que el Final lanzamiento de la versión 2.0 fue Prematuramente en libertad?? Sí, hay muchos usuarios satisfechos,

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

2009-11-07 Thread Ray_Net
Robert Kaiser wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: snip Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

2009-11-05 Thread User
OldCroc wrote: With all the problems that too many seasoned users, of SeaMonkey,are having, is it possible that the Final release of version 2.0 was released PREMATURELY?? Yes, there are many satisfied users, also, but there ARE too many who are NOT and the attitude of the developers should be

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

2009-11-05 Thread Leonidas Jones
Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: snip Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not solved SM2 is *not*

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

2009-11-05 Thread Lance Courtland
Leonidas Jones wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: snip Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

2009-11-05 Thread Leonidas Jones
Lance Courtland wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: snip Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

2009-11-05 Thread Phillip Jones
Leonidas Jones wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: snip Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug