Re: javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/22/13 6:08 PM, question wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 22.01.2013 15:05, question wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> Hartmut Figge wrote: >>>> WaltS: >>>>> On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: &g

Re: javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread question
Jay Garcia wrote: On 22.01.2013 15:05, question wrote: --- Original Message --- Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS: On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: javascript is not a registered protocol. The address specifies a protocol (e.g. wxyz://) the browser does not

Re: Fixed ---javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread question
Jay Garcia wrote: On 22.01.2013 16:38, question wrote: --- Original Message --- Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS: On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: javascript is not a registered protocol. The address specifies a protocol (e.g. wxyz://) the browser does not

Re: Fixed ---javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread Jay Garcia
On 22.01.2013 16:38, question wrote: --- Original Message --- > Hartmut Figge wrote: >> WaltS: >>> On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: >> >>>> javascript is not a registered protocol. >>>> >>>>The addre

Re: javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread Jay Garcia
On 22.01.2013 15:05, question wrote: --- Original Message --- > Hartmut Figge wrote: >> WaltS: >>> On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: >> >>>> javascript is not a registered protocol. >>>> >>>>The address s

Fixed ---javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread question
Hartmut Figge wrote: > WaltS: >> On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: > >>> javascript is not a registered protocol. >>> >>>The address specifies a protocol (e.g. wxyz://) the browser >>> does not recognize, so

Re: javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread question
Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS: On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: javascript is not a registered protocol. The address specifies a protocol (e.g. wxyz://) the browser does not recognize, so the browser cannot properly connect to the site. foxnews.com works just

Re: javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread Hartmut Figge
WaltS: >On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: >> javascript is not a registered protocol. >> >> The address specifies a protocol (e.g. wxyz://) the browser >> does not recognize, so the browser cannot properly connect to the site. > >foxnew

Re: javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread WaltS
On 01/22/2013 03:36 PM, question wrote: question wrote: javascript is not a registered protocol kills fosnews webpage, Started after upgrading Seamonkey last night to 2.15.1 So now we disable Javascript ? Spelling correction Foxnews.com Unknown Protocol javascript is not

Re: javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread question
question wrote: javascript is not a registered protocol kills fosnews webpage, Started after upgrading Seamonkey last night to 2.15.1 So now we disable Javascript ? Spelling correction Foxnews.com Unknown Protocol javascript is not a registered protocol

javascript is not a registered protocol

2013-01-22 Thread question
javascript is not a registered protocol kills fosnews webpage, Started after upgrading Seamonkey last night to 2.15.1 So now we disable Javascript ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org