Re: [Sursound] Soundfield MK IV Disassembly

2016-03-29 Thread Richard Lee
> I have a question for the keepers of ancient wisdom: how does one remove the capsule assembly from a Soundfield MK IV microphone? I have one on which the 1 kilohm "capsule heater" resistor has gone open circuit. The cone on the MK V and newer is split and comes apart pretty readily, but the

Re: [Sursound] Flac for FOA or amb files?

2016-03-29 Thread Bob Burton
c. 4209 W. Vanowen Place Burbank, CA 91505 323-874-1000 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160329/fd9b5b8c/attachment.html> ___ Surso

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-29 Thread David Pickett
At 20:51 29-03-16, Peter Lennox wrote: >wasn't the original conception for stereo = 90 degrees, but 'hole in >the middle' effects led to standardising on the narrower figure? There seemd to be an echo in here! Running down the email and deleting as I go, I come to: >> From: David Pickett

Re: [Sursound] Ambi Head

2016-03-29 Thread Charles Verron
Thanks for your comment Dave. For info, the intro price ends in three days (59 instead of 99 euros). Feedback and feature requests are welcome for the next releases. Best regards, Charles www.noisemakers.fr On 13 mars 2016, at 13:36, Dave Hunt wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-29 Thread Peter Lennox
OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo > source in rotating soundfield, possible? > > > The problem with speakers at +/- 45 degrees is that one needs a > wide room if one is to sit at a decent distance from them. > However, it can be impressive. I have found the effect even b

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-29 Thread Dave Hunt
at. It is not simply a question of feeding the centre speaker with a -3dB sum, but quite easy to implement. David -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160329/e82cf2f4/attachment.h

Re: [Sursound] Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-29 Thread Peter Lennox
Actually, dissenting voices apart, I can see how one might want some items in a sound field to be localisable, and some not. If this is actually what is wanted here - and taking into account one might want a particular component to be 'everywhere and nowhere' - but not inside the head - then a