On 30/05/2019 17:51, mgraves mstvp.com wrote:
The RF issue of range, carrier frequency, channel width is quite separate from
the deliverable audio path.
The Opus audio codec has revolutionized audio coding. It's able to deliver
full-bandwidth audio at bitrates not much more than what was once
At 12:44 31-05-19, Chris Woolf wrote:
I don't know Opus but having read up its spec (on Wikipedia) it is
lossy and so can only be used as a delivery format. I had to smile
at 30ms latency being reported as adequate for musicians to feel "in-time"
Yes, indeed! As an experienced organist I can s
On 28/05/2019 13:34, David Pickett wrote:
...
I tell myself that it should not be too difficult to make decent
hi-res transmit and receive modules. I could use these for links from
spot mikes in concerts where these have to pass the audience to get to
the recorder, and also between my monito
I have both the Rode and the ST350. Just shout if you want any help
j...@jonhoneyball.com
> On 16 May 2019, at 15:29, Ross Adams wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Could someone supply any links to the Sursound archives discussing the
> difference between the Rode soundfield and the St350. I'm researching
Chris,
Actually, I too come from a broadcast background, having installed graphics
systems into production and master controls for over 25 years. I completely
appreciate the demand for hard real-time and zero latency.
I've tracked Opus since its earliest days in the IETF CODEC working group. Th
ment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190531/f2e08f40/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
coherence) it should
> work perfectly well. If you used it for passing the output channels of
> a microphone I doubt you would not remain happy for long.
>
> Which also means that the statement "the RF issue of range, carrier
> frequency, channel width is quite separate from the deliv
g.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
-Original Message-
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190531/f2e08f40/attachment.html>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sur
hard to see how any proprietary codec vendor could
>> compete
>>
>> except where addressing a very narrow niche.
>>
>> Michael Graves
>>
>> mgra...@mstvp.com
>>
>> http://www.mgraves.org
>>
>> o(713) 861-4005
>>
>> c(7
_howtomakeambisonicssoundgood.pdf>,
this may not be the correct approach.
Any feedback, tips, tricks or advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance everyone!
--
Sean Devonport
-- next part --
An HTML attachment
be the correct approach.
Any feedback, tips, tricks or advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance everyone!
--
Sean Devonport
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190531/
; https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190531/51b02491/attachmen
d mailing list
>> Sursound@music.vt.edu
>> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
>> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.mus
13 matches
Mail list logo
