Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-25 Thread John Lundsten
27;s yet another attempt by Apple to create yet another format 'the other lot can't read'. JL - Original Message - From: Fons Adriaensen To: sursound@music.vt.edu Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 10:05 PM Subject: Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-24 Thread John Lundsten
But this retruns to your original question, in the form: what commonly used software unpacks and plays XYZ ... ;-(> Well as approx 98% of computers are PC's, whatever the merits of CAF (beyond ticking the 'box' this is different to what is available on a PC) it would be totally unsuitable to the

Re: [Sursound] Compatibility DR-680/AMS 250?

2011-09-06 Thread John Lundsten
ase gain mis-match between chan is <0.1dB. What you need to do is turn the front panel vols knobs fully clockwise & just use the switchable gains. The R44 has for sure rather more noisy mic amps than the SD7xx recorders, but I suspect the ST250 being rather noisy too, won't be compromise

Re: [Sursound] B format recording

2011-02-23 Thread John Lundsten
Chris Cody wrote If Pro Tools isn't an option, what do you recommend that will work with a digi 002? (until I can upgrade and remove digidesign rubbish from my life all together) PT is not at all well suited to what you want to do. Reaper is very good in general & more to the point way better tha

Re: [Sursound] Why do you need to decode ambisonic/b format signals ?

2011-01-22 Thread John Lundsten
To add to what Jörn & Fons have written. Even for "simple" stereo/2 chan audio playback. If you were to have made a MS rather than L-R use of your 2 chan recording media, stereo width can be chosen after the recording event. And even better if your recording were 3 channel, Front, Rear & L/R

Re: [Sursound] Hamasaki 22.2

2010-11-04 Thread John Lundsten
Sampo Syreeni wrote but the real treat is the companion document at http://wiki.xiph.org/Channel_mapping_examples where I mapped just about every format in existence to what we came up with in channel semantics. Do take a look at it and disseminate the work if right. Well it looks "right to me"