raves mstvp.com
> o(713) 861-4005
> c(713) 201-1262
> sip:mgra...@mjg.onsip.com
> skype mjgraves
>
> > Original Message
> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers
> > From: Sven Thebert
> > Date: Wed, September 25, 2013 3:2
I like the Creative/Cambridge SoundWorks FPS1000 a lot.
You can only get them used. They're cheap and not nice to look at, but they
have great sound.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:45 PM, David Pickett wrote:
> At 15:47 25-09-13, Alessandro Fogar wrote:
>
> >I'k like to monitor some work of mine rea
osauro, recorded by Paul Hodges. It could also be that
I simply had luck with the timing.
Thanks,
Sven Thebert
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130925/05ba846d/attachment.htm
I did a glimpse look into bluetooth. But there are some disadvantages:
It's a piconet, which will support up to 7 slaves. But it can
selfconfigure to a scatternet, where every slave can act like a new
master and have 7 slaves ...
Bluetooth 2.0 EDR has datarates of 2-3 Mbit/s, bluetooth 3.0 ~24
Mbi
will have to define some realtime constraints.
Fons, you wrote, that the delay should be within 0.5ms. Is this a good
value to stay away from the Haas effect? Maybe within 0.5ms precedence
the localisation is going to "smear"? Does anybody know anything about
it or is it a naive idea?
Th
t some decoding algorithms for different
speaker layouts.
I would be happy for some replies,
thanks in advance,
Sven Thebert
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
