Re: [Sursound] 4 D sound (!)

2014-03-06 Thread Timothy Schmele
bed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140305/707e58e6/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound -- Documento sin título *Timothy Schme

Re: [Sursound] Recreating a 3d soundfield with lots of mics.....

2013-05-17 Thread Timothy Schmele
I think some artists have had success with this technique. If my memory serves me right, check if you can find anything from Erwin Roebroeks, doing an installation where he built two identical grids of each microphones and speakers, so that each speaker is in the exact same position as the mic

Re: [Sursound] The commercial future of Ambisonics

2013-05-16 Thread Timothy Schmele
opposed to sound fields, I would say that this is the current trend. (FYI, I am also not saying that I like nor dislike this trend) On 5/16/13 7:01 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: Timothy Schmele wrote: The industry is moving towards object oriented encoding of 3D soundtracks anyway. This is p

[Sursound] Spatial Music Artist Stories

2013-05-16 Thread Timothy Schmele
Maybe some nice reading material: http://www.roebroeks.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Spatial-Music-Artist-Stories1.pdf ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] The commercial future of Ambisonics

2013-05-15 Thread Timothy Schmele
Be careful, merely neglecting ambisonics in general for pointsources includes higher order ambisonics, which are *well* suited for localized sources as of the third order and up (although I have not heard any ambisonic decoding beyond the third) in spherical 3D sound. Also, unlike what you're