On 2022-05-25, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
I am still not too sure if even now things are standardised enough
for anyone to write a fresh file format for it that pleases everyone.
It doesn't have to please anybody at all. It just needs to work, and be
implemented in a widely known and FLOSS
On 2022-05-27, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Hello Richard,
Having been caught up in beach bum matters for some years,
You are like...just so cool. Never have I ever... 8)
--
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-40-3751464, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9
Hello Richard,
> Having been caught up in beach bum matters for some years,
Happy to hear you are still providing the sharks with their
daily ration of SCUBA divers...
> I've lost track of all the latest machinations. But is there
> a simple authoritative definition of AmbiX ?
The best as far
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 08:45:42AM +0100, Richard Dobson wrote:
> I am still not too sure if
> even now things are standardised enough for anyone to write a fresh file
> format for it that pleases everyone. Suffice it to say, such things can't
> just be written,they have to be implemented and
Welcome to my world - as it used to be! The ring-pass-not is that word
'standardised". My AMB Wavex-based file format is now 22 years old
(FuMa, up to third-order). People have long moved on - basically as soon
as that was published, everyone here started arguing about all the other
On 2022-05-24, Alan Kan wrote:
Ah… it seems one has to actually click on the file to see that detail.
I was downloading from the list page.
Why not embed the a standardised format descriptor into the file itself?
Most formats permit that. In fact that's what we've been doing all along
convention of Ambisonic Sound Library Files
Each file's page indicates the convention; all the ones I've looked at have
been AmbiX, but I've only looked at a small fraction of the files.
The ones I have downloaded have names that appear random, like
Acdb7b0a20a799bde7257.wav
... no obvious indication
Each file's page indicates the convention; all the ones I've looked at have
been AmbiX, but I've only looked at a small fraction of the files.
The ones I have downloaded have names that appear random, like
Acdb7b0a20a799bde7257.wav
... no obvious indication of the convection used.
It's a great
It is a bit confusing. I’m pretty sure many of them are in Aformat, as
captured by microphone which it does name in the title or listing info.
They have a nice free plugin to convert to various b formats
JJ
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:43 AM Jack Reynolds
wrote:
> As far as the know each file
As far as the know each file has the format in the file name.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 May 2022, at 13:16, Alan Kan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could tell me whether the audio examples in the
> Ambisonic Sound Library on https://library.soundfield.com/ are in FuMa or
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me whether the audio examples in the
Ambisonic Sound Library on https://library.soundfield.com/ are in FuMa or AmbiX
format? I couldn't find this detail on the website.
Thanks
Alan
---
Dr. Alan Kan, PhD (he/his/him)
Research Fellow
School of
11 matches
Mail list logo
