Dave Malham wrote:
...
> Also, unless I'm mistaken (always possible),
> it only seems to go back to 2011.
The earliest "Ambeo" post is 2016 so, on this
occasion, 2011 is plenty.
I have saved the Sursound Digests in my
Gmail account going back to August 2008
(Volume 1, Issue 1), and possibly earli
Hi David,
we'll be publishing a study comparing a number of ambisonic mics at AES
Berlin next month. We had an Ambeo, TetraMic, Soundfield MKV, Zoom H2n and
an Eigenmike, and we assessed them using an objective directional study,
and a subjective listening test on low and high frequency timbre.
The comparison was discussed in the Facebook group
Spatial Audio in VR/AR/MR
Best regards
Bo-Erik Sandholm
On 26 Apr 2017 07:57, "Dave Malham" wrote:
> Welcome back, mate, always a pleasure!
>
>Dave
>
> On 25 April 2017 at 23:00, David Worrall wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> >
> > (I’ve
Welcome back, mate, always a pleasure!
Dave
On 25 April 2017 at 23:00, David Worrall wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> (I’ve survived moving continents twice since last posting. Now holed up
> mit Family in Chicago).
>
> I’m about 3-4 years behind on ambsionic research and now I’m introducing
> it
That's interesting, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks Marc. Note that to avoid
confusion go to 'advanced search' and select sort by date otherwise you'll
get a list as sorted by relevance of some sort not date. Not much good if
you are looking for history. Also, unless I'm mistaken (always possible),
The messages sent to sursound can be searched here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/sursound@music.vt.edu/
--
Marc
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:00:07 -0500
David Worrall wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> (I’ve survived moving continents twice since last posting. Now holed
> up mit Family in Chicago).
>
Hello all,
(I’ve survived moving continents twice since last posting. Now holed up mit
Family in Chicago).
I’m about 3-4 years behind on ambsionic research and now I’m introducing it to
a largely ignorant cohort here.
My trusty TetraMic is working well, as long as ambient RF is not too b
