[Suspend-devel] [PATCH] initramfs generation with yaird

2006-06-14 Thread Jason Lunz
on debian unstable, this is all I needed to get yaird to generate an initramfs image with ususpend support. Jason --- Templates.cfg.orig 2006-06-14 23:33:34.0 -0400 +++ Templates.cfg 2006-06-14 23:39:58.0 -0400 @@ -400,6 +400,8 @@ # TEMPLATE resume

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend in shell

2006-06-14 Thread Jason Lunz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I'm familiar with hibernate script, but I see a couple of minor issues: Thanks for looking at it. Here's a version that's less half-assed; the last one was a quick search-and-replace job. > suspend may fail, yet you don't propagate the return value. Is this > correct? I

Re: [Suspend-devel] installing suspend on machine that *already* has initrd

2006-06-14 Thread John H.
why does it work with the 2.6.16 kernels then? what would you suggest i try to get around this issue? On 6/14/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 14 June 2006 21:26, John H. wrote: > > here is the dmesg after reboot. the first reboot my modules.dep was > > gone becaus

Re: [Suspend-devel] installing suspend on machine that *already* has initrd

2006-06-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 21:26, John H. wrote: > here is the dmesg after reboot. the first reboot my modules.dep was > gone because yum had installed some new kernels, so if you see > anything regarding that, ignore it(it worked on next boot) Thanks. > Linux version 2.6.17-rc6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend in shell

2006-06-14 Thread Luca
Il Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:20:25PM +, Jason Lunz ha scritto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> Or if somebody wants to make a scriptlet to support it (use the > >> sysfs_power_state scriptlet as a guide), I'll happily merge it for > >> the next release. > > > > That's

Re: [Suspend-devel] installing suspend on machine that *already* has initrd

2006-06-14 Thread John H.
here is the dmesg after reboot. the first reboot my modules.dep was gone because yum had installed some new kernels, so if you see anything regarding that, ignore it(it worked on next boot) Linux version 2.6.17-rc6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1)) #1 SMP Fri Jun

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend in shell

2006-06-14 Thread Jason Lunz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> Or if somebody wants to make a scriptlet to support it (use the >> sysfs_power_state scriptlet as a guide), I'll happily merge it for >> the next release. > > That's exactly what I did. I'll post it tonight when my laptop's on. > It's completely

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram working for SAMSUNG R65

2006-06-14 Thread Georg Dankovszky
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:56:35PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On St 14-06-06 13:50:32, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > > And if you need no workarounds at all when in X, then you also do not > > > need a whitelist entry ;-) > > > > Or perhaps we should add whitelist entry saying Xonly? Well, I gue

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram working for SAMSUNG R65

2006-06-14 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:56:35PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On St 14-06-06 13:50:32, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > And if you need no workarounds at all when in X, then you also do not need > > a whitelist entry ;-) > > Or perhaps we should add whitelist entry saying Xonly? Well, I guess > it re

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram working for SAMSUNG R65

2006-06-14 Thread Georg Dankovszky
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 13:56 schrieb Pavel Machek: > On St 14-06-06 13:50:32, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:38:28PM +0200, Georg Dankovszky wrote: > > > Stefan, > > > unfortunatey not. tried all available options and combinations, but to > > > no avail. > > > > ok, so we

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram working for SAMSUNG R65

2006-06-14 Thread Pavel Machek
On St 14-06-06 13:50:32, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:38:28PM +0200, Georg Dankovszky wrote: > > Stefan, > > unfortunatey not. tried all available options and combinations, but to no > > avail. > > ok, so we should not whitelist it in s2ram, since it does not work ;-) > And

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram working for SAMSUNG R65

2006-06-14 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:38:28PM +0200, Georg Dankovszky wrote: > Stefan, > unfortunatey not. tried all available options and combinations, but to no > avail. ok, so we should not whitelist it in s2ram, since it does not work ;-) And if you need no workarounds at all when in X, then you also do

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram working for SAMSUNG R65

2006-06-14 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 10:23:52AM +0200, Georg Dankovszky wrote: > Hi list! > > I finally got s2ram working on the SAMSUNG R65 and the NVIDIA binary driver: > > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD." > sys_product = "SR65S" > sys_version

[Suspend-devel] s2ram working for SAMSUNG R65

2006-06-14 Thread Georg Dankovszky
Hi list! I finally got s2ram working on the SAMSUNG R65 and the NVIDIA binary driver: This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD." sys_product = "SR65S" sys_version = "07XE" bios_version = "08XE" I had to update the BIOS to version 08XE. Now