On Sat 2006-07-01 00:12:20, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:44:42 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of
> > > > > > uswsusp. Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs.
> > > > > > I
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:44:42 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of
> > > > > uswsusp. Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs.
> > > > > In was wondering what archs are supported by uswsusp. I guess
> >
Hi!
> > Of course this all could also be implemented in s2ram, but i doubt that we
> > really want to duplicate this, when the code is already present and usable
> > in HAL.
>
> I think s2ram can get info from HAL easier than HAL from s2ram, but I'm
> biased :-
Design criteria: It has to work on
Hi!
> > > > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > > > Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
> > > > what archs are supported by uswsusp. I guess the s2ram bit is powerpc,
> > > > i386 and amd. But for s2disk you more or less only nee
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 09:18 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for lagging a bit on my email, it has been a quite busy week :-)
Me too, just got back from GUADEC, sorry.
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:22:52PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Maybe you've seen this already:
> > http://hu
Hi,
On Friday 30 June 2006 13:01, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > > Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
> > > what archs are supported by uswsusp. I guess the s2ram bit is powerpc,
> > > i386 and amd
On Wed 2006-06-28 10:30:29, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:29:13 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > I added my machines to the whitelist.c. One is a desktop system,
> > > 's2ram -n' only identifies it with the bios version. Also the work
> > > around
Hi!
> > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
> > what archs are supported by uswsusp. I guess the s2ram bit is powerpc,
> > i386 and amd. But for s2disk you more or less only need swap, right?
>
On Friday 30 June 2006 12:27, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:22:20 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Friday 30 June 2006 10:44, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > > Debian curren
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:22:20 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 30 June 2006 10:44, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
> > what a
On Friday 30 June 2006 11:27, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 30 June 2006 11:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Friday 30 June 2006 10:44, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > > Debian currently supprts on the order
On Friday 30 June 2006 11:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 30 June 2006 10:44, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
> > what archs are supported by uswsusp
Hi,
On Friday 30 June 2006 10:44, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
> what archs are supported by uswsusp. I guess the s2ram bit is powerpc,
> i386 and amd. But for s2disk
Hi all,
As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
what archs are supported by uswsusp. I guess the s2ram bit is powerpc,
i386 and amd. But for s2disk you more or less only need swap, right?
Does anybody
14 matches
Mail list logo
