Hi,
The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image saving by
pressing Ctrl+c.
Comments welcome.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
suspend.c | 48 +---
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
==
On Wednesday, 1 November 2006 11:13, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2006-11-01 11:10:46, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 1 November 2006 10:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > > Well, but if some data structures are different than the tmpfs
> > > > > > > driv
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 02:29:01PM +0100, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
> this hp nx5000 revision can be added to the whitelist, s2ram works
> fine with the vbe_save option (s2ram -fp)
...which is the vbe_post option.
> sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard"
> sys_product = "Compaq nx5000 (DU399T#ABZ)
this hp nx5000 revision can be added to the whitelist, s2ram works
fine with the vbe_save option (s2ram -fp)
sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard"
sys_product = "Compaq nx5000 (DU399T#ABZ) "
sys_version = "F.0D"
bios_version = "68BCU Ver. F.0D"
--
-
On Wed 2006-11-01 11:10:46, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, 1 November 2006 10:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > Well, but if some data structures are different than the tmpfs
> > > > > > driver thinks
> > > > > > they are, the kernel could oops/panic at umount, co
Hi,
On Wednesday, 1 November 2006 10:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > Well, but if some data structures are different than the tmpfs driver
> > > > > thinks
> > > > > they are, the kernel could oops/panic at umount, couldn't it?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it could, but they won't be. After
Hi!
> > > > Well, but if some data structures are different than the tmpfs driver
> > > > thinks
> > > > they are, the kernel could oops/panic at umount, couldn't it?
> > >
> > > Yes, it could, but they won't be. After a successful resume the tmpfs
> > > will
> > > be in the same state as befo
On Monday, 30 October 2006 17:23, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:26:55PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Well, but if some data structures are different than the tmpfs driver
> > > thinks
> > > they are, the kernel could oops/panic at umount, couldn't it?
> >
> > Yes, i
