On Thu 2007-05-10 01:35:33, Martin Heimes wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> >>>My machine is not in the whitelist (...)
> >>all S3 options in BIOS set to enabled
> >>
> >>revo:~# s2ram -i
> >>This machine can be identified by:
> >> sys_vendor = "Compaq"
> >> sys_product = "Evo D510 USDT"
> >>
Well, as long as video works, it probably should be whitelisted.
- Forwarded message from Per Waag? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Per Waag? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Suspend-devel] S2ram working on unknown machine
To: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
> > No no... syslog timestamps are unreliable at this point. downing cpus
> > take 704.5-704.4 seconds. You need to actually watch console to see
> > when it hangs, and I suspect it is not here.
> >
>
> OK. I'll try to print the messages to the console and watch it. I hope
> the screen doesn
"Paulo J. S. Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to let you know...
>
> I have found out that the bug was already known in the U205 older
> brother, the U200 laptop:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/90771
Thanks. I walked through those pages and append
On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 19:30, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > Yes, something like that should do...
> > I'd prefer not to call ACPI functions from outside of drivers/acpi,
> > but this could be cleaned later.
>
> Actually, I was thinking of
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 19:30, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Yes, something like that should do...
> I'd prefer not to call ACPI functions from outside of drivers/acpi,
> but this could be cleaned later.
Actually, I was thinking of adding two operations to hibernation_ops() (now,
that we have it :
Just to let you know...
I have found out that the bug was already known in the U205 older
brother, the U200 laptop:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/90771
Paulo
-
This SF.net email is spo
Hello,
you can add this PC to your whitelist. I used the build in VGA card (Fujitsu
Siemens i845).
# uname -r
2.6.18.8-0.3-default
# s2ram -i
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS"
sys_product = "SCENIC N300/N600"
sys_version = ""
bios_versi
Yes, something like that should do...
I'd prefer not to call ACPI functions from outside of drivers/acpi,
but this could be cleaned later.
On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 15:34, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > we needed to call pm_prepare() on boot
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 15:34, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> we needed to call pm_prepare() on boot kernel only to disable GPEs to
> resolve 7887. It will also blink the LEDs during the resume image
> load, but it's possible to live without it.
> If you drop call to pm_prepare(), we still need to d
["Followup-To:" header set to gmane.linux.kernel.suspend.devel.]
On 2007-05-09, 12:27 GMT, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Just curious but what do you need ndiswrapper for?
bcm4318 (not supported even by the most bleeding edge of
bcm43xx).
Matej
---
we needed to call pm_prepare() on boot kernel only to disable GPEs to
resolve 7887. It will also blink the LEDs during the resume image
load, but it's possible to live without it.
If you drop call to pm_prepare(), we still need to disable GPEs, so
they will not fire during image switch. So if we di
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 13:59, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> This patch will disable EC GPE, which seems to be major problem.
Could you please explain to me why you think so?
Greetings,
Rafael
-
This SF.net email is sponsore
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 08:58, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> I expect http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 this bug to
> pop again with this patch.
Well, this change only reflects what's done in kernel/power/disk.c .
Greetings,
Rafael
--
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 14:16 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> ["Followup-To:" header set to gmane.linux.kernel.suspend.devel.]
> On 2007-05-09, 09:44 GMT, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Matthias also maintains them at ATrpms
> >
> > http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/kernel-suspend2/
> >
> > so that all kmdl support at AT
["Followup-To:" header set to gmane.linux.kernel.suspend.devel.]
On 2007-05-09, 09:44 GMT, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Matthias also maintains them at ATrpms
>
> http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/kernel-suspend2/
>
> so that all kmdl support at ATrpms can be made available for this
> kernel series, like for examp
This patch will disable EC GPE, which seems to be major problem.
Regards,
Alex
On 5/9/07, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I expect http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 this bug to
pop again with this patch.
Regards,
Alex.
On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Em Qua, 2007-05-09 às 11:56 +0200, Pavel Machek escreveu:
>
> No no... syslog timestamps are unreliable at this point. downing cpus
> take 704.5-704.4 seconds. You need to actually watch console to see
> when it hangs, and I suspect it is not here.
>
OK. I'll try to print the messages to the co
On Tue 2007-05-08 13:09:05, Per Waag? wrote:
> s2ram -f simply works on my computer.
>
> s2ram -i gives this output:
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Packard Bell NEC"
> sys_product = "000"
> sys_version = "P820008416"
> bios_version = "R
Hi!
> > My machine is not in the whitelist (...)
>
> all S3 options in BIOS set to enabled
>
>
> revo:~# s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Compaq"
> sys_product = "Evo D510 USDT"
> sys_version = " "
> bios_version = "686O1 v1.05"
> See http://
Hi!
> I have the same laptop as him, a U205-S5067. I also get basically the
> same behavior: is I try to suspend, the screen power off very fast but
> the fan start moving like there is some processing going on.
>
> But, if I wait long enough (between 5 and 10 minutes) the system
> suspends to r
Hi,
thanks for the great work ! :)
Output of "s2ram -i" is :
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "NEC COMPUTERS INTERNATIONAL"
sys_product = "NEC Versa Premium"
sys_version = "FAB-2"
bios_version = "R1.05 "
++
Benoit.
---
Hi,
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:38:16AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 23:13 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > just a question, whether somebody made uswsusp working with Fedora
> > Core 6? Old kernel is unacceptably slow for me, and I need
> > ndiswrapper so kernel-suspend2 pack
23 matches
Mail list logo
