Hi!
> > I'm not sure if it is right solution for today or not, but medium/long
> > term, we do not want to ship our private copy.
>
> So how about that:
> - we do not ship our own copy
> - per default we link against the system-wide installed copy
> - there is a "CONFIG_OWN_LIBX86=yes" switch tha
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Note: this patch will not compile right now, you'll need to unpack
> > > > libx86
> > > > into ./libx86 inside the suspend source.
> > >
> > > Why libpci is not included within suspend, same for zlib, lzf, gpg-error,
Hi!
> > > Note: this patch will not compile right now, you'll need to unpack libx86
> > > into ./libx86 inside the suspend source.
> >
> > Why libpci is not included within suspend, same for zlib, lzf, gpg-error,
> > gcrypt? Leave it externall :)
>
> Yes, i also thought about that. OTOH it is a
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:45:46PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our diff to VBETool 1.0 is virtually non-existent, the only
> 'significant' change is the do_get_mode / __get_mode change.
> Can't we persuade Matthew to take these changes? than we can just point
> at vbetool code and drop it
On Monday 05 of March 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> ;-) So let's do a poll: what distributions already include libx86 as a
> package?
>
pld-linux.org (also today suspend snap from cvs) ;)
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/
-
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:44:22 +0100
Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ;-) So let's do a poll: what distributions already include libx86 as a
> package?
/me raises hand
Debian has, that is probably related to the fact that Matthew is a
debian developer...
grts Tim
-
Hi,
Our diff to VBETool 1.0 is virtually non-existent, the only
'significant' change is the do_get_mode / __get_mode change.
Can't we persuade Matthew to take these changes? than we can just point
at vbetool code and drop it from out repository.
Then maybe I can persuade him to create a vbetool-d
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:28:27PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:03:18 +0100
> Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:35:10AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > On Monday 05 of March 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > >
> > > > Note: t
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:03:18 +0100
Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:35:10AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Monday 05 of March 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> >
> > > Note: this patch will not compile right now, you'll need to unpack libx86
> > > int
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:35:10AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 05 of March 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> > Note: this patch will not compile right now, you'll need to unpack libx86
> > into ./libx86 inside the suspend source.
>
> Why libpci is not included within suspend, sa
On Monday 05 of March 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Note: this patch will not compile right now, you'll need to unpack libx86
> into ./libx86 inside the suspend source.
Why libpci is not included within suspend, same for zlib, lzf, gpg-error,
gcrypt? Leave it externall :)
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiew
Hi,
actually, the changes in vbetool are quite small (and the last hunk is
actually reverting a fix we had for quite some time, so i'd skip this one
unless Matthew tells me that the fix is no longer needed).
This is the patch without the moving from
vbetool/x86emu to
libx86emu/
I can also send
12 matches
Mail list logo