On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 10:31:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > HPC nx6325. Someone has reported he's managed to get s2ram working on it,
> > but it looks like his machine is slightly different to this one ...
>
> Is there some way to identify your model? Can you post s2ram strings?
> Ste
Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 22:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > SMP boxes (especially on i386 ones), please do so and tell me if there
> > > > are
> > > > any problems.
> > > >
> > > > The last patch is untested.
> > >
> > > I guess I should fix s2ram enough that it works for you...
Hi!
> > > SMP boxes (especially on i386 ones), please do so and tell me if there are
> > > any problems.
> > >
> > > The last patch is untested.
> >
> > I guess I should fix s2ram enough that it works for you... What is the
> > primary notebook you are using?
>
> HPC nx6325. Someone has report
Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 08:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The discussion in a recent thread on Linux-PM has indicated that it's
> > necessary to call pm_ops->finish() before devce_resume(),
> > but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be called before pm_ops->finish()
> > (cf. http://lists.o
Hi!
> The discussion in a recent thread on Linux-PM has indicated that it's
> necessary to call pm_ops->finish() before devce_resume(),
> but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be called before pm_ops->finish()
> (cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006-November/004164.html).
> For consistency
Hi,
The discussion in a recent thread on Linux-PM has indicated that it's
necessary to call pm_ops->finish() before devce_resume(),
but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be called before pm_ops->finish()
(cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006-November/004164.html).
For consistency, it seems
