Hi!
> > > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, what was this for?
> > > >
> > > > Debugging leds on port 80. I still have that card somewhere
> > > > :-). Interesting part
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 16:01, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > >
> > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > >
> > > > Well, what was this for?
> > >
> > > Debugging leds on port 80. I still have that
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:43:34PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:01:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > > >
> >
Hi!
> > > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > > b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > > index 1415da1..9cebef7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > > +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > > @@ -28,21 +28,6 @@ #define BEEP \
> > > movb$15, %al; \
> > >
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 16:43, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:01:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > > >
> > > > > Well
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:01:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > >
> > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > >
> > > > Well, what was this for?
> > >
> > > Debugging leds on port 80. I still
Hi!
> > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > >
> > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > >
> > > Well, what was this for?
> >
> > Debugging leds on port 80. I still have that card somewhere
> > :-). Interesting parties can reinsert it.
>
> Ah
Hi,
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:18, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > This removes some stale debugging infrastructure from s2ram
> > > paths. Also, there's no need to verify_cpu on x86-64 -- cpu can't
> > > change during s2ram, and removed #if 0-ed code. Some testing would be
> > > useful, perpa
Hi!
> > This removes some stale debugging infrastructure from s2ram
> > paths. Also, there's no need to verify_cpu on x86-64 -- cpu can't
> > change during s2ram, and removed #if 0-ed code. Some testing would be
> > useful, perpahs it will even fix someone's machine :-). (VGA accesses
> > could th
Hi,
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This removes some stale debugging infrastructure from s2ram
> paths. Also, there's no need to verify_cpu on x86-64 -- cpu can't
> change during s2ram, and removed #if 0-ed code. Some testing would be
> useful, perpahs it will even
Hi!
This removes some stale debugging infrastructure from s2ram
paths. Also, there's no need to verify_cpu on x86-64 -- cpu can't
change during s2ram, and removed #if 0-ed code. Some testing would be
useful, perpahs it will even fix someone's machine :-). (VGA accesses
could theoretically hurt if
11 matches
Mail list logo
