Hi,
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 20:31, Miroslav Ruda wrote:
> ..
> It's patched version from suspend-0.50-6 (rpm on OpenSuse 10.2). I
> have attached patched s2ram.c too.
>
> Best regards
>
> Mirek Ruda
thanks a lot for your testing.
I now have a new version of the patc
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:23:09AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hey, we need testing testing testing on this patch. People were
> complaining that we don't do pci state saving, where are they now?!
Enjoying holidays?
Patched s2ram restores VGA correctly on my Lifebook S7110, but then reports:
e
Hi!
> > Now it looks much better to me, but I'd actually free the pci_dev object
> > when
> > it's no longer necessary.
> >
> > And I have a question: is it possible that we don't find a VGA device? And
> > if
> > so, then what are we going to do?
>
> Both fixed by Frank Seidel for version 3
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 06:52:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 14:37, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > Index: s2ram.c
> > +struct pci_dev *find_vga(void)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_access *pacc;
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > + struct pci_dev *result;
> > +
> >
Hi,
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 14:37, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:50:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Now it looks much better to me, but I'd actually free the pci_dev object
> > when
> > it's no longer necessary.
> >
> > And I have a question: is it
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:50:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Now it looks much better to me, but I'd actually free the pci_dev object when
> it's no longer necessary.
>
> And I have a question: is it possible that we don't find a VGA device? And if
> so, then what are we going to do
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:50:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> Now it looks much better to me, but I'd actually free the pci_dev object when
> it's no longer necessary.
Ah, i thought that's what exit() is there for :-)
I'll look into it.
> And I have a question: is it possible that w
Hi,
On Monday, 18 December 2006 21:50, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (i'll discuss this on suspend-devel, we can take the rest back into cc: once
> the coding issues are solved :-)
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:00:41PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > Index: s2ram.c
> > > ===
Hi,
(i'll discuss this on suspend-devel, we can take the rest back into cc: once
the coding issues are solved :-)
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:00:41PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Index: s2ram.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvsroot/s
On Monday, 18 December 2006 18:48, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:05:51PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:29:16PM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> > > - implement this as a workaround in userspace?
> >
> > Might be easier for the moment, though
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:05:51PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:29:16PM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > - implement this as a workaround in userspace?
>
> Might be easier for the moment, though I agree that it's less than
> ideal.
Ok, so how about that (compiled
Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi Miroslav,
>
> i'm taking suspend-devel into cc:, maybe somebody there has an idea about
> this, too.
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:18:31PM +0100, Miroslav Ruda wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm installing opensuse 10.2 on Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook 7110 (intel
>> dual core, inte
Hi,
On Monday, 18 December 2006 13:16, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > thanks for explaining this, i am obviously not too deep into that
> > PCI bus stuff :-)
> >
> ...
> > > > I thought that this should somehow go away by the PCI bus suspend/resume
> > > > methods that somewhen back got merged
Hi!
> thanks for explaining this, i am obviously not too deep into that
> PCI bus stuff :-)
>
...
> > > I thought that this should somehow go away by the PCI bus suspend/resume
> > > methods that somewhen back got merged by Greg K-H.
> >
> > The kernel will only save and restore the standardised
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:29:16PM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> So the question is: should we either
> - implement a minimal "graphics card PCI suspend resume" "driver" in the
>kernel that will do this even if no framebuffer is used, or
The long term aim is to implement a thin graphics car
Hi Matthew,
thanks for explaining this, i am obviously not too deep into that
PCI bus stuff :-)
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:11:42AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 07:51:36AM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> > I thought that this should somehow go away by the PCI bus susp
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 07:51:36AM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> I thought that this should somehow go away by the PCI bus suspend/resume
> methods that somewhen back got merged by Greg K-H.
The kernel will only save and restore the standardised PCI configuration
registers - anything else need
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:13:08PM +0100, Miroslav Ruda wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:33:58PM +0100, Frank Ursel wrote:
> > Before i actually suspend the notebook, i write some data about the
> > graphic card on disk and on resume the data is written back to the
> > graphic card and everythin
Hi Miroslav,
i'm taking suspend-devel into cc:, maybe somebody there has an idea about
this, too.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:18:31PM +0100, Miroslav Ruda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing opensuse 10.2 on Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook 7110 (intel
> dual core, intel 965 chipset, intel 945 graphics chip
19 matches
Mail list logo
