Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl

2007-06-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I just got this report from a swap-offset user: > > > > I've just stumbled upon this message in my syslog after today's upgrade > > of uswsusp: > > > > program swap-offset is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it > > to SG_IO > > That smells fishy, since i only see two

Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl

2007-05-31 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:47:34PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Hi Luca, > > I just got this report from a swap-offset user: > > I've just stumbled upon this message in my syslog after today's upgrade of > uswsusp: > > program swap-offset is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it

[Suspend-devel] swap-offset is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl

2007-05-20 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi Luca, I just got this report from a swap-offset user: I've just stumbled upon this message in my syslog after today's upgrade of uswsusp: program swap-offset is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it to SG_IO grts Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature ---

Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset

2007-01-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 18 January 2007 21:45, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > Il Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:26:12PM -0700, Brandon Beck ha scritto: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >(added Cc to suspend-devel and the author of swap-offset) > > > > > >On Thursday, 18 January 2007 08:32, you wrote: > > >

Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset

2007-01-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 18 January 2007 23:21, Brandon Beck wrote: > That fixed it! Good. > Because the documentation didn't exactly specify, does s2disk/resume need its > own > swapfile, or can it use ~1/2*RAM of a swapfile currently mounted and in use? It can use the currently mounted one. Greeting

Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset

2007-01-18 Thread Brandon Beck
That fixed it! Because the documentation didn't exactly specify, does s2disk/resume need its own swapfile, or can it use ~1/2*RAM of a swapfile currently mounted and in use? Thanks, Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Il Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:26:12PM -0700, Brandon Beck ha scritto: >> [EMAIL

Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset

2007-01-18 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:26:12PM -0700, Brandon Beck ha scritto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Hi, > > > >(added Cc to suspend-devel and the author of swap-offset) > > > >On Thursday, 18 January 2007 08:32, you wrote: > >>Hello Rafael, > >> Is the resume offset ever supposed to be a negative n

Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset

2007-01-18 Thread Brandon Beck
For good or for ill, I have a single partition (sda1) and I recently created the swapfile for use with uswsusp, so it is presumably towards the end of the disk. On /dev/sda1 I have 76920416 1K blocks with 1299176 available (99% use :-) Thanks, Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > (adde

Re: [Suspend-devel] swap-offset

2007-01-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, (added Cc to suspend-devel and the author of swap-offset) On Thursday, 18 January 2007 08:32, you wrote: > Hello Rafael, >Is the resume offset ever supposed to be a negative number? I run > swap-offset /var/swap on a 2.6.20-rc5 kernel and get -270968. I don't > really want to mess up