On 7/20/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 July 2006 18:58, Luca wrote:
> > (btw, rsa_data_set was leacked):
>
> Yes, it was intentional. If you free the key created out of a data set, you
> can't free the data set itself, apparently, or you get a double free
> (libg
On Thursday 20 July 2006 18:58, Luca wrote:
> Il Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:13:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > On Wednesday 19 July 2006 21:38, Luca wrote:
> > > Il Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > > > The libgcrypt's AES seems to be significantl
Il Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:13:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> On Wednesday 19 July 2006 21:38, Luca wrote:
> > Il Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > > The libgcrypt's AES seems to be significantly slower than the openssl's
> > > Blowfish, but well
Hi!
> > > The appended patch makes s2disk/s2both and resume use libgcrypt instead
> > > of openssl. It also replaces Blowfish with AES (128bit).
> > >
> >
> > It works perfectly (only tested suspend-to-disk). Great work, as usual.
>
> Thanks! :-)
>
> > > The libgcrypt's AES seems to be signifi
Hi,
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 21:09, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The appended patch makes s2disk/s2both and resume use libgcrypt instead
> > of openssl. It also replaces Blowfish with AES (128bit).
> >
>
> It works perfectly (only tested su
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 21:38, Luca wrote:
> Il Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > The libgcrypt's AES seems to be significantly slower than the openssl's
> > Blowfish, but well. Also IMHO libgcrypt is less convenient than openssl
> > and the documentation
Il Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> The libgcrypt's AES seems to be significantly slower than the openssl's
> Blowfish, but well. Also IMHO libgcrypt is less convenient than openssl
> and the documentation sucks.
Agree...
Btw, it should be made very clear
Hi Rafael
On 7/19/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The appended patch makes s2disk/s2both and resume use libgcrypt instead
> of openssl. It also replaces Blowfish with AES (128bit).
>
It works perfectly (only tested suspend-to-disk). Great work, as usual.
> The libgcry
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 18:40, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The libgcrypt's AES seems to be significantly slower than the openssl's
> > Blowfish, but well.
>
> libgcrypt is supposed to do Blowfish too (GCRY_CIPHER_BLOWFISH). What is
> the reason for switching to AES?
No
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The libgcrypt's AES seems to be significantly slower than the openssl's
> Blowfish, but well.
libgcrypt is supposed to do Blowfish too (GCRY_CIPHER_BLOWFISH). What is
the reason for switching to AES?
Michal
10 matches
Mail list logo
