Thanks Doug...much clearer. Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Younker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Reference to Real ID Act in State of the Union
> My response was about Greg Palast's editorial,
My response was about Greg Palast's editorial, *not* any error on your
part, Mike. As I said Palast makes valid points about "big brother",
but I wouldn't forward that editorial on to anyone, that I would want to
convince of an impending problem. Why? His misrepresentation of the
purpose of
January 28, 2007 2:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Reference to Real ID Act in State of the Union
>I read this from Greg Palast earlier. Too bad he calls into question,
> valid points about big "brother", by mis-characterizing The Strategic
> Petroleum Reserve. No matter what side of
I read this from Greg Palast earlier. Too bad he calls into question,
valid points about big "brother", by mis-characterizing The Strategic
Petroleum Reserve. No matter what side of the issue Palast is not the
only commentator, to give cause to question their remarks, with obvious
spin. I s
Anyway...that's what I know...or don't know...to date. Mike
- Original Message -
From: Debra
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Reference to Real ID Act in State of the Union
I grew up in New Hamps
Subject: [Biofuel] Reference to Real ID Act in State of the Union
I wish Palast would have referenced outright H.R.1268, Title II (the Real ID
Act) in this article, but he makes the point of concern to all US citizens
anyway. By the way, New Hampshire has rejected this Act
(http://www.newswithviews
I wish Palast would have referenced outright H.R.1268, Title II (the Real ID
Act) in this article, but he makes the point of concern to all US citizens
anyway. By the way, New Hampshire has rejected this Act
(http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd177.htm). What are you doing to get
your Stat
