Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

To each his own poison, eh? :-) Keith. Three quick points and then I have to get back to work. First, although acrolein and saccharin may both Group 3 compounds according to IARC, you yourself pointed out that the *reasons* for which they recieved that label are very very different. Logi

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Three quick points and then I have to get back to work. First, although acrolein and saccharin may both Group 3 compounds according to IARC, you yourself pointed out that the *reasons* for which they recieved that label are very very different. Logically, saying "we don't have enough eviden

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

We tend to make a lot of fuss over acrolein fumes from burning glyc, apparently with good reason, but the IARC says the same about acrolein, also Group 3: Evaluation There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of acrolein. There is inadequate evidence in experimental an

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Dear Eagle, I was not advocating the use of the little pink packets that contain saccahrin which indeed is a carcinogenic. Splenda comes in yellow packets. As far a reading about food products on the internet I'll trust the Center for Science in the Public Interest, before I'll listen to someone

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Complete earful on the "benefits" (not) of cow's milk. http://www.notmilk.com Luc - Original Message - From: "Martin K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:28 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose to

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Phillip Wolfe wrote: Thanks Bob, (Professor Allen), My adopted family from Honduras would only drink raw organic milk, goats milk and believe it not even donkey's milk! They are very healthy individuals. They do not like store bought milk but that is about the only choice we have nowadays. B

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic --vs dogma

Obviously you have never read "Pottengers Cats" by Frances Pottenger MD or "Nutrition and Physical Degeneration" by Weston Price. I have seen "Quackwatch" and it is typical of those who set themselves up as keepers of the one true faith. They attempt to sweep all dissidents into the same trash ca

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Thanks Bob, (Professor Allen), My adopted family from Honduras would only drink raw organic milk, goats milk and believe it not even donkey's milk! They are very healthy individuals. They do not like store bought milk but that is about the only choice we have nowadays. By the way, I know of one

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

G'day Ken; Before suggesting that others follow you into the lovely carcinogenic world of methanol producing artificial sweeteners. Methanol in the system is cumulative no it is not. It is metabolized into formaldehyde and formic acid rather quickly. Toxic in high concentrations but mea

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

ratbags.com quackwatch.com Legal Eagle wrote: G'day Phillip/Kirk; Stevia, even if 100% natural, has also had some negative reports come out about it, however I am not in a position to call that one. As for the artificial sweeteners, there are not sufficient words that adequately describe

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

all ; ) Over the last six months I have come to realize that the major reason why autistic children need to avoid milk is because it is pasteurized. The pasteurization process turns casein into a very dangerous molecule that can furt

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Dear Eagle, I was not advocating the use of the little pink packets that contain saccahrin which indeed is a carcinogenic. Splenda comes in yellow packets. As far a reading about food products on the internet I'll trust the Center for Science in the Public Interest, before I'll listen to someone m

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

body then that is your choice, but to say that it is good is erroneous at best. - Original Message - From: "Ken Riznyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic Phillip, Befo

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

those concerned abou such things. Luc - Original Message - From: "Phillip Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 1:34 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic Dear Kirk, Thanks for the info. I read the comp

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Phillip, Before you jump on the bandwagon you might want to read this I alway like how these news releases pretend that they are on the crux of a new discovery. Stevia has been available in health food stores for years, and in some full service supermarket

Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

Dear Kirk, Thanks for the info. I read the complete text. My WWII veteran father is slight diabetic and I will definitely research and forward to my sistes for review for our father. Here an academic report I found on the internet: http://ari.calstate.edu/FundedProjects/abstract-Production.htm

[Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic

If you don't have your health you have nothing. Kirk Dr. Mercola's Comment: You probably recall an article I posted regarding the overwhelming popularity of Splenda/sucralose in processed foods that is preventing the product's manufacturer (Tate & Lyle) from taking on new customers and li