woof.
On Sep 1, 2011 1:31 PM, Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really?
http://search.japantimes.co.jp:80/mail/eo20110831rs.html
Wednesday, Aug. 31, 2011
Time for U.S. to say yes to Canadian oil sands
By ROBERT J. SAMUELSON
The Washington Post
WASHINGTON - When it comes to
From my personal standpoint as a Canadian, I find it funny how they sight
stengthening the strategic alliance between
Canada and the United States, when the only strategy I can personally see is
the destruction of massive amounts of land
and waterways to pipe ecologically unsound oil
Interesting that when you are addicted to coke, the problem does not
seem to be the addition, but where to get more coke. Nowhere in the
article did I see any discussion of reducing oil demand.
Z
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:02 PM, C Pinelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my personal
on Thursday, September 1, 2011 1:48:16 PM Darryl McMahon [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Economically viable does not equal environmentally viable.
Indeed.
Economically viable has become nearly the antithesis of
environmentally viable
If 'nearly' applies. Some would say it IS the antithesis.
On Friday, September 2, 2011 10:04:50 AM Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interesting that when you are addicted to coke, the problem does not
seem to be the addition, but where to get more coke. Nowhere in the
article did I see any discussion of reducing oil demand.
Z
Nor is it
Really?
http://search.japantimes.co.jp:80/mail/eo20110831rs.html
Wednesday, Aug. 31, 2011
Time for U.S. to say yes to Canadian oil sands
By ROBERT J. SAMUELSON
The Washington Post
WASHINGTON - When it comes to energy, America is lucky to be next to
Canada, whose proven oil reserves are
Economically viable does not equal environmentally viable.
http://ottawaaction.ca/join-us (Sept. 26th, 2011, Ottawa Parliament
Hill re: Tar Sands mining)
http://www.restco.ca/Inuvik_RT_Ottawa.shtml (Sept. 12-16, Ottawa, Canada
Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa Forum concurrent with Inuvik
